BMW iX vs Cadillac Vistiq

Biggest differences: Boot — BMW iX 500 l, Cadillac Vistiq 297 l · WLTP range — BMW iX 701 km, Cadillac Vistiq 460 km · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX 4.6 s, Cadillac Vistiq 3.9 s.

BMW iX

An all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering all-wheel drive and a WLTP range of up to 701 kilometers.

Cadillac Vistiq

The Cadillac Vistiq is an electric SUV in the E segment with AWD drive, offering a range of 460 km according to the WLTP cycle and acceleration to 100 km/h in 3.9 seconds.

Profile against the market: BMW iX vs Cadillac Vistiq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX or Cadillac Vistiq — who wins where

BMW iX leads 5 to 4

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX +241 km
    BMW iX
    701
    Cadillac Vistiq
    460
  • Battery kWhBMW iX +7.1 kWh
    BMW iX
    109.1
    Cadillac Vistiq
    102
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmCadillac Vistiq −0.1 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX
    21.9
    Cadillac Vistiq
    21.8
  • Power PSCadillac Vistiq +80 PS
    BMW iX
    544
    Cadillac Vistiq
    624
  • 0–100 km/h sCadillac Vistiq −0.7 s
    BMW iX
    4.6
    Cadillac Vistiq
    3.9
  • Top speed km/hCadillac Vistiq +10 km/h
    BMW iX
    200
    Cadillac Vistiq
    210
  • DC charging kWBMW iX +5 kW
    BMW iX
    195
    Cadillac Vistiq
    190
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX
    11
    Cadillac Vistiq
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    BMW iX
    35
    Cadillac Vistiq
  • Weight kgBMW iX −394 kg
    BMW iX
    2505
    Cadillac Vistiq
    2899
  • Boot lBMW iX +203 l
    BMW iX
    500
    Cadillac Vistiq
    297

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX vs Cadillac Vistiq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX vs Cadillac Vistiq
Key parameters BMW iX
xDrive60
Cadillac Vistiq
AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range701 km460 kmBMW +241 km
Battery109.1 kWh102 kWhBMW +7.1 kWh
Consumption21.9 kWh/100 km21.8 kWh/100 kmCadillac −0.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging195 kW190 kWBMW +5 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%35 min
Range per minute of charging14 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power544 PS624 PSCadillac +80 PS
0–100 km/h4.6 s3.9 sCadillac −0.7 s
Top speed200 km/h210 km/hCadillac +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2505 kg2899 kgBMW −394 kg
Boot500 l297 lBMW +203 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Cadillac
Length4965 mm5216 mmCadillac +251 mm
Width1970 mm2026 mmCadillac +56 mm
Height1695 mm1787 mmCadillac +92 mm
Wheelbase3000 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX

Cost per 100 km6.57
Monthly82
Yearly985

Cadillac Vistiq

Cost per 100 km6.54
Monthly82
Yearly981

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX

Cadillac Vistiq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX or Cadillac Vistiq?

The BMW iX goes further: 701 km WLTP against the 460 km of the Cadillac Vistiq. That is a difference of 241 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Cadillac Vistiq — its 102 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX, with 109.1 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW iX takes more: 500 l against 297 l in the Cadillac Vistiq. The difference is 203 l.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX accepts up to 195 kW DC, the Cadillac Vistiq up to 190 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.