BYD Atto 2 vs Lynk & Co 02
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 2 7.9 s, Lynk & Co 02 5.5 s · Power — BYD Atto 2 204 PS, Lynk & Co 02 272 PS · Charging 10–80% — BYD Atto 2 25 min, Lynk & Co 02 30 min.
BYD Atto 2
This electric SUV, belonging to the C-segment, offers two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and maximum power outputs.
Lynk & Co 02
The Lynk & Co 02 Long Range (Model Year 2025) is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 445 kilometers.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 2 vs Lynk & Co 02
BYD Atto 2Comfort
Lynk & Co 02Long Range
BYD Atto 2 or Lynk & Co 02 — who wins where
Lynk & Co 02 leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLynk & Co 02 +15 km
- Battery kWhLynk & Co 02 +1.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLynk & Co 02 −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLynk & Co 02 +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLynk & Co 02 −2.4 s
- Top speed km/hLynk & Co 02 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWBYD Atto 2 +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minBYD Atto 2 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Atto 2 −100 kg
- Boot lBYD Atto 2 +40 l
Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs Lynk & Co 02
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 2 Comfort | Lynk & Co 02 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 430 km | 445 km | Lynk & Co +15 km |
| Battery | 64.8 kWh | 66 kWh | Lynk & Co +1.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.4 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Lynk & Co −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 155 kW | 150 kW | BYD +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 25 min | 30 min | BYD −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12 km/min | 10.4 km/min | BYD +1.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 272 PS | Lynk & Co +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 5.5 s | Lynk & Co −2.4 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | Lynk & Co +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1720 kg | 1820 kg | BYD −100 kg |
| Boot | 450 l | 410 l | BYD +40 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4310 mm | 4460 mm | Lynk & Co +150 mm |
| Width | 1830 mm | 1845 mm | Lynk & Co +15 mm |
| Height | 1675 mm | 1573 mm | BYD +102 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2755 mm | Lynk & Co +135 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 2
Lynk & Co 02
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 2
Lynk & Co 02
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 2 or Lynk & Co 02?
The Lynk & Co 02 goes further: 445 km WLTP against the 430 km of the BYD Atto 2. That is a difference of 15 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 2 and the Lynk & Co 02 differ?
The BYD Atto 2 has FWD and 204 PS. The Lynk & Co 02 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 2 or Lynk & Co 02?
The Lynk & Co 02 is stronger: 272 PS against the 204 PS of the BYD Atto 2. The gap is 68 PS.
Which charges faster?
The BYD Atto 2 accepts up to 155 kW DC, the Lynk & Co 02 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 25 and 30 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.