BMW iX5 vs Nio EL8

BMW iX5 leads 7 to 4

Biggest differences: Boot — BMW iX5 655 l, Nio EL8 265 l · AC charging — BMW iX5 22 kW, Nio EL8 11 kW · DC charging — BMW iX5 460 kW, Nio EL8 240 kW.

BMW iX5

The BMW iX5 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers 578 horsepower, a range of up to 845 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 460 kW.

Nio EL8

The Nio EL8 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering a high power output of 653 horsepower and all-wheel drive, available with two battery configurations.

Profile against the market: BMW iX5 vs Nio EL8

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX5 or Nio EL8 — who wins where

BMW iX5 leads 7 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX5 +335 km
    BMW iX5
    845
    Nio EL8
    510
  • Battery kWhBMW iX5 +41 kWh
    BMW iX5
    141
    Nio EL8
    100
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX5 −1.1 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX5
    20.1
    Nio EL8
    21.2
  • Power PSNio EL8 +75 PS
    BMW iX5
    578
    Nio EL8
    653
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio EL8 −0.5 s
    BMW iX5
    4.6
    Nio EL8
    4.1
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX5 +10 km/h
    BMW iX5
    210
    Nio EL8
    200
  • DC charging kWBMW iX5 +220 kW
    BMW iX5
    460
    Nio EL8
    240
  • AC charging kWBMW iX5 +11 kW
    BMW iX5
    22
    Nio EL8
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNio EL8 −3 min
    BMW iX5
    23
    Nio EL8
    20
  • Weight ↓ kgNio EL8 −267 kg
    BMW iX5
    2825
    Nio EL8
    2558
  • Boot lBMW iX5 +390 l
    BMW iX5
    655
    Nio EL8
    265

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Nio EL8

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Nio EL8
Key parameters BMW iX5
60 xDrive
Nio EL8
100 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range845 km510 kmBMW +335 km
Battery141 kWh100 kWhBMW +41 kWh
Consumption ↓20.1 kWh/100 km21.2 kWh/100 kmBMW −1.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging460 kW240 kWBMW +220 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWBMW +11 kW
Charging 10–80% ↓23 min20 minNio −3 min
Range per minute of charging25.7 km/min17.9 km/minBMW +7.8 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VBMW +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power578 PS653 PSNio +75 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.6 s4.1 sNio −0.5 s
Top speed210 km/h200 km/hBMW +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2825 kg2558 kgNio −267 kg
Boot655 l265 lBMW +390 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Nio
Length4994 mm5099 mmNio +105 mm
Width2000 mm1989 mmBMW +11 mm
Height1748 mm1750 mmNio +2 mm
Wheelbase3035 mm3070 mmNio +35 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX5

Cost per 100 km6.03
Monthly75
Yearly905

Nio EL8

Cost per 100 km6.36
Monthly79
Yearly954

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX5

Nio EL8

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX5 or Nio EL8?

The BMW iX5 goes further: 845 km WLTP against the 510 km of the Nio EL8. That is a difference of 335 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Nio EL8 — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX5, with 141 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW iX5 takes more: 655 l against 265 l in the Nio EL8. The difference is 390 l.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX5 accepts up to 460 kW DC, the Nio EL8 up to 240 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 20 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.