BMW iX5 vs Cadillac Vistiq
BMW iX5 leads 7 to 2
Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX5 460 kW, Cadillac Vistiq 190 kW · Boot — BMW iX5 655 l, Cadillac Vistiq 297 l · AC charging — BMW iX5 22 kW, Cadillac Vistiq 11 kW.
BMW iX5
The BMW iX5 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers 578 horsepower, a range of up to 845 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 460 kW.
Cadillac Vistiq
The Cadillac Vistiq is an electric SUV in the E segment with AWD drive, offering a range of 460 km according to the WLTP cycle and acceleration to 100 km/h in 3.9 seconds.
Profile against the market: BMW iX5 vs Cadillac Vistiq
BMW iX560 xDrive
Cadillac VistiqAWD
BMW iX5 or Cadillac Vistiq — who wins where
BMW iX5 leads 7 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX5 +385 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX5 +39 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX5 −1.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSCadillac Vistiq +46 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sCadillac Vistiq −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWBMW iX5 +270 kW
- AC charging kWBMW iX5 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX5 −74 kg
- Boot lBMW iX5 +358 l
Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Cadillac Vistiq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX5 60 xDrive | Cadillac Vistiq AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 845 km | 460 km | BMW +385 km |
| Battery | 141 kWh | 102 kWh | BMW +39 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 20.1 kWh/100 km | 21.8 kWh/100 km | BMW −1.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 460 kW | 190 kW | BMW +270 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | BMW +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 25.7 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | BMW +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 578 PS | 624 PS | Cadillac +46 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.6 s | 3.9 s | Cadillac −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 210 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2825 kg | 2899 kg | BMW −74 kg |
| Boot | 655 l | 297 l | BMW +358 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Cadillac |
| Length | 4994 mm | 5216 mm | Cadillac +222 mm |
| Width | 2000 mm | 2026 mm | Cadillac +26 mm |
| Height | 1748 mm | 1787 mm | Cadillac +39 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3035 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX5
Cadillac Vistiq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Cadillac Vistiq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX5 or Cadillac Vistiq?
The BMW iX5 goes further: 845 km WLTP against the 460 km of the Cadillac Vistiq. That is a difference of 385 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Cadillac Vistiq — its 102 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX5, with 141 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BMW iX5 takes more: 655 l against 297 l in the Cadillac Vistiq. The difference is 358 l.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX5 accepts up to 460 kW DC, the Cadillac Vistiq up to 190 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.