BMW i5 vs Volvo ES90

Biggest differences: Power — BMW i5 340 PS, Volvo ES90 680 PS · DC charging — BMW i5 205 kW, Volvo ES90 350 kW · 0–100 km/h — BMW i5 6 s, Volvo ES90 4 s.

BMW i5

The BMW i5 is an all-electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 340 horsepower to 601 horsepower.

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 is an electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three powertrain variants with WLTP ranges of up to 702 km.

Profile against the market: BMW i5 vs Volvo ES90

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW i5 or Volvo ES90 — who wins where

Volvo ES90 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo ES90 +75 km
    BMW i5
    627
    Volvo ES90
    702
  • Battery kWhVolvo ES90 +24.8 kWh
    BMW i5
    81.2
    Volvo ES90
    106
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW i5 −2 kWh/100 km
    BMW i5
    14.7
    Volvo ES90
    16.7
  • Power PSVolvo ES90 +340 PS
    BMW i5
    340
    Volvo ES90
    680
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo ES90 −2 s
    BMW i5
    6
    Volvo ES90
    4
  • Top speed km/hBMW i5 +13 km/h
    BMW i5
    193
    Volvo ES90
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo ES90 +145 kW
    BMW i5
    205
    Volvo ES90
    350
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW i5
    11
    Volvo ES90
    11
  • Charging minVolvo ES90 −8 min
    BMW i5
    30
    Volvo ES90
    22
  • Weight kgBMW i5 −400 kg
    BMW i5
    2135
    Volvo ES90
    2535
  • Boot lBMW i5 +48 l
    BMW i5
    490
    Volvo ES90
    442

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW i5 vs Volvo ES90

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW i5 vs Volvo ES90
Key parameters BMW i5
eDrive40
Volvo ES90
Twin Motor Performance
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range627 km702 kmVolvo +75 km
Battery81.2 kWh106 kWhVolvo +24.8 kWh
Consumption14.7 kWh/100 km16.7 kWh/100 kmBMW −2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging205 kW350 kWVolvo +145 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min22 minVolvo −8 min
Range per minute of charging14.6 km/min22.3 km/minVolvo +7.7 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VVolvo +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power340 PS680 PSVolvo +340 PS
0–100 km/h6 s4 sVolvo −2 s
Top speed193 km/h180 km/hBMW +13 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2135 kg2535 kgBMW −400 kg
Boot490 l442 lBMW +48 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Volvo
Length5060 mm5000 mmBMW +60 mm
Width1900 mm1942 mmVolvo +42 mm
Height1515 mm1549 mmVolvo +34 mm
Wheelbase2995 mm3102 mmVolvo +107 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW i5

Cost per 100 km4.41
Monthly55
Yearly661

Volvo ES90

Cost per 100 km5.01
Monthly63
Yearly752

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW i5

Volvo ES90

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW i5 or Volvo ES90?

The Volvo ES90 goes further: 702 km WLTP against the 627 km of the BMW i5. That is a difference of 75 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW i5 and the Volvo ES90 differ?

The BMW i5 has RWD and 340 PS. The Volvo ES90 has AWD and 680 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Volvo ES90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW i5, with 81.2 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BMW i5 or Volvo ES90?

The Volvo ES90 is stronger: 680 PS against the 340 PS of the BMW i5. The gap is 340 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.