BMW i5 Touring vs Zeekr 001
Biggest differences: AC charging — BMW i5 Touring 11 kW, Zeekr 001 22 kW · Power — BMW i5 Touring 340 PS, Zeekr 001 272 PS · Battery — BMW i5 Touring 81.2 kWh, Zeekr 001 100 kWh.
BMW i5 Touring
The BMW i5 Touring is an electric estate in the E-segment, offering three drive variants with power ranging from 340 horsepower to 601 horsepower.
Zeekr 001
The Zeekr 001 is an all-electric estate in the E-segment, offering three different powertrain options with power outputs ranging from 272 horsepower to 544 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BMW i5 Touring vs Zeekr 001
BMW i5 TouringeDrive40
Zeekr 001Long Range RWD
BMW i5 Touring or Zeekr 001 — who wins where
BMW i5 Touring leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmZeekr 001 +18 km
- Battery kWhZeekr 001 +18.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW i5 Touring −0.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBMW i5 Touring +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW i5 Touring −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hZeekr 001 +7 km/h
- DC charging kWBMW i5 Touring +5 kW
- AC charging kWZeekr 001 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgBMW i5 Touring −95 kg
- Boot lBMW i5 Touring +31 l
Technical data: BMW i5 Touring vs Zeekr 001
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW i5 Touring eDrive40 | Zeekr 001 Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 602 km | 620 km | Zeekr +18 km |
| Battery | 81.2 kWh | 100 kWh | Zeekr +18.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.5 kWh/100 km | 17.3 kWh/100 km | BMW −0.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 205 kW | 200 kW | BMW +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Zeekr +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 30 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 14 km/min | 14.5 km/min | Zeekr +0.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 340 PS | 272 PS | BMW +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.1 s | 7.2 s | BMW −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 193 km/h | 200 km/h | Zeekr +7 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2180 kg | 2275 kg | BMW −95 kg |
| Boot | 570 l | 539 l | BMW +31 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Zeekr |
| Length | 5060 mm | 4955 mm | BMW +105 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1999 mm | Zeekr +99 mm |
| Height | 1515 mm | 1560 mm | Zeekr +45 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2995 mm | 2999 mm | Zeekr +4 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW i5 Touring
Zeekr 001
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BMW i5 Touring
Other comparisons in this class: Estate, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW i5 Touring or Zeekr 001?
The Zeekr 001 goes further: 620 km WLTP against the 602 km of the BMW i5 Touring. That is a difference of 18 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Zeekr 001 — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW i5 Touring, with 81.2 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The BMW i5 Touring accepts up to 205 kW DC, the Zeekr 001 up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 30 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The BMW i5 Touring uses less electricity: 16.5 kWh/100 km against 17.3 kWh/100 km in the Zeekr 001. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 120 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.