Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Xpeng G6
Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 22 min, Xpeng G6 12 min · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Xpeng G6 451 kW · WLTP range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 679 km, Xpeng G6 525 km.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Xpeng G6
The Xpeng G6 is a crossover (segment D) that offers three different powertrain options and supports fast DC charging up to 451 kW.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Xpeng G6
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Xpeng G6Long Range RWD
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Xpeng G6 — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +154 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +14.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +10 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +8 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G6 +181 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minXpeng G6 −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgXpeng G6 −85 kg
- Boot lXpeng G6 +60 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Xpeng G6
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Xpeng G6 Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 525 km | Audi +154 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 80 kWh | Audi +14.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 17.5 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 451 kW | Xpeng +181 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 12 min | Xpeng −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 30.6 km/min | Xpeng +9 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 296 PS | Audi +10 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.7 s | Audi −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 202 km/h | Audi +8 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2115 kg | Xpeng −85 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 571 l | Xpeng +60 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4758 mm | Audi +13 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1920 mm | Audi +19 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1650 mm | Xpeng +39 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2890 mm | Audi +3 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Xpeng G6
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Xpeng G6
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Xpeng G6?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 525 km of the Xpeng G6. That is a difference of 154 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng G6 — its 80 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Xpeng G6 takes more: 571 l against 511 l in the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. The difference is 60 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Xpeng G6 up to 451 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 12 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.