Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Togg T10X
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Togg T10X 22 kW · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Togg T10X 180 kW · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, Togg T10X 218 PS.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Togg T10X
The Togg T10X is a D-segment SUV that offers rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, as well as the option for fast DC charging.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Togg T10X
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Togg T10XV1 RWD Long Range
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Togg T10X — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +156 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +6.4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −3.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +88 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +25 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +90 kW
- AC charging kWTogg T10X +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgTogg T10X −102 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +70 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Togg T10X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Togg T10X V1 RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 523 km | Audi +156 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 88.5 kWh | Audi +6.4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 19.1 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 180 kW | Audi +90 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Togg +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 28 min 20–80% | 6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 11.2 km/min | Audi +10.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 218 PS | Audi +88 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.8 s | Audi −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 185 km/h | Audi +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2098 kg | Togg −102 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 441 l | Audi +70 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Togg |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4599 mm | Audi +172 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1886 mm | Audi +53 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1676 mm | Togg +65 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2890 mm | Audi +3 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Togg T10X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Togg T10X
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Togg T10X?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 523 km of the Togg T10X. That is a difference of 156 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Togg T10X — its 88.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Togg T10X?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 218 PS of the Togg T10X. The gap is 88 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron takes more: 511 l against 441 l in the Togg T10X. The difference is 70 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.