Elaris BEO vs Togg T10X

Biggest differences: AC charging — Elaris BEO 11 kW, Togg T10X 22 kW · DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Togg T10X 180 kW · Charging 20–80% — Elaris BEO 45 min, Togg T10X 28 min.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Togg T10X

The Togg T10X is a D-segment SUV that offers rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, as well as the option for fast DC charging.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Togg T10X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Togg T10X — who wins where

Togg T10X leads 8 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmTogg T10X +34 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Togg T10X
    523
  • Battery kWhTogg T10X +2.5 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Togg T10X
    88.5
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmTogg T10X −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Togg T10X
    19.1
  • Power PSTogg T10X +14 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Togg T10X
    218
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Togg T10X
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hTogg T10X +35 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Togg T10X
    185
  • DC charging kWTogg T10X +80 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Togg T10X
    180
  • AC charging kWTogg T10X +11 kW
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Togg T10X
    22
  • Charging minTogg T10X −17 min
    Elaris BEO
    45
    Togg T10X
    28
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −143 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Togg T10X
    2098
  • Boot lElaris BEO +26 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Togg T10X
    441

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Togg T10X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Togg T10X
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Togg T10X
V1 RWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km523 kmTogg +34 km
Battery86 kWh88.5 kWhTogg +2.5 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km19.1 kWh/100 kmTogg −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW180 kWTogg +80 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWTogg +11 kW
Charging 20–80%45 min28 minTogg −17 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min11.2 km/minTogg +4.7 km/min
Voltage
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS218 PSTogg +14 PS
0–100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed150 km/h185 km/hTogg +35 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2098 kgElaris −143 kg
Boot467 l441 lElaris +26 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Togg
Length4698 mm4599 mmElaris +99 mm
Width1908 mm1886 mmElaris +22 mm
Height1696 mm1676 mmElaris +20 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2890 mmTogg +90 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Togg T10X

Cost per 100 km5.73
Monthly72
Yearly860

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Togg T10X

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Togg T10X?

The Togg T10X goes further: 523 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 34 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Togg T10X differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Togg T10X has RWD and 218 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Togg T10X — its 88.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Elaris BEO accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Togg T10X up to 180 kW. Charging from 20 to 80% takes 45 and 28 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.