Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru E-Outback
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Subaru E-Outback 150 kW · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, Subaru E-Outback 4.5 s · Battery — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 94.9 kWh, Subaru E-Outback 71 kWh.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Subaru E-Outback
The Subaru E-Outback is an SUV in the D segment, offering all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of 526 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru E-Outback
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Subaru E-OutbackAWD 280 kW
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Subaru E-Outback — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +153 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +23.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNo difference
- Power PSSubaru E-Outback +75 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSubaru E-Outback −2.1 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +30 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +120 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgSubaru E-Outback −190 kg
- Boot lSubaru E-Outback +108 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru E-Outback
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Subaru E-Outback AWD 280 kW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 526 km | Audi +153 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 71 kWh | Audi +23.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 15.3 kWh/100 km | No difference |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 150 kW | Audi +120 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 28 min | Audi −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 13.2 km/min | Audi +8.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 381 PS | Subaru +75 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 4.5 s | Subaru −2.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Audi +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2010 kg | Subaru −190 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 619 l | Subaru +108 l |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4845 mm | Subaru +74 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1860 mm | Audi +79 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1675 mm | Subaru +64 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2850 mm | Audi +43 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Subaru E-Outback
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Subaru E-Outback
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Subaru E-Outback?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 526 km of the Subaru E-Outback. That is a difference of 153 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the Subaru E-Outback differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Subaru E-Outback has AWD and 381 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Subaru E-Outback takes more: 619 l against 511 l in the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. The difference is 108 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Subaru E-Outback up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.