Subaru E-Outback vs Xpeng G6
Biggest differences: DC charging — Subaru E-Outback 150 kW, Xpeng G6 451 kW · Charging 10–80% — Subaru E-Outback 28 min, Xpeng G6 12 min · 0–100 km/h — Subaru E-Outback 4.5 s, Xpeng G6 6.7 s.
Subaru E-Outback
The Subaru E-Outback is an SUV in the D segment, offering all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of 526 kilometers.
Xpeng G6
The Xpeng G6 is a crossover (segment D) that offers three different powertrain options and supports fast DC charging up to 451 kW.
Profile against the market: Subaru E-Outback vs Xpeng G6
Subaru E-OutbackAWD 280 kW
Xpeng G6Long Range RWD
Subaru E-Outback or Xpeng G6 — who wins where
Subaru E-Outback leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru E-Outback +1 km
- Battery kWhXpeng G6 +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSubaru E-Outback −2.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSubaru E-Outback +85 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSubaru E-Outback −2.2 s
- Top speed km/hXpeng G6 +22 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G6 +301 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minXpeng G6 −16 min
- Weight ↓ kgSubaru E-Outback −105 kg
- Boot lSubaru E-Outback +48 l
Technical data: Subaru E-Outback vs Xpeng G6
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Subaru E-Outback AWD 280 kW | Xpeng G6 Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 526 km | 525 km | Subaru +1 km |
| Battery | 71 kWh | 80 kWh | Xpeng +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 17.5 kWh/100 km | Subaru −2.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 451 kW | Xpeng +301 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 12 min | Xpeng −16 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.2 km/min | 30.6 km/min | Xpeng +17.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Xpeng +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 381 PS | 296 PS | Subaru +85 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.5 s | 6.7 s | Subaru −2.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 202 km/h | Xpeng +22 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2010 kg | 2115 kg | Subaru −105 kg |
| Boot | 619 l | 571 l | Subaru +48 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4845 mm | 4758 mm | Subaru +87 mm |
| Width | 1860 mm | 1920 mm | Xpeng +60 mm |
| Height | 1675 mm | 1650 mm | Subaru +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2890 mm | Xpeng +40 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Subaru E-Outback
Xpeng G6
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Subaru E-Outback
Xpeng G6
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Xpeng G6 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Subaru E-Outback?
The Xpeng G6 carries 80 kWh and covers 525 km, while the Subaru E-Outback with its 71 kWh battery does 526 km. Energy use decides it: 17.5 against 15.3 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Subaru E-Outback and the Xpeng G6 differ?
The Subaru E-Outback has AWD and 381 PS. The Xpeng G6 has RWD and 296 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng G6 — its 80 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Subaru E-Outback, with 71 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Subaru E-Outback accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Xpeng G6 up to 451 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 12 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.