Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs MG S6 EV
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, MG S6 EV 144 kW · Charging 10–80% — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 22 min, MG S6 EV 38 min · Boot — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 511 l, MG S6 EV 674 l.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
MG S6 EV
The MG S6 EV is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering two drive variants with different power outputs and axle configurations.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs MG S6 EV
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
MG S6 EVRWD
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or MG S6 EV — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +149 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +20.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +62 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +126 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −16 min
- Weight ↓ kgMG S6 EV −292 kg
- Boot lMG S6 EV +163 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs MG S6 EV
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | MG S6 EV RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 530 km | Audi +149 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 74.3 kWh | Audi +20.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 16.6 kWh/100 km | Audi −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 144 kW | Audi +126 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 38 min | Audi −16 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 9.8 km/min | Audi +11.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 244 PS | Audi +62 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | Audi −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 1908 kg | MG −292 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 674 l | MG +163 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only MG |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4708 mm | Audi +63 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1912 mm | Audi +27 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1672 mm | MG +61 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2835 mm | Audi +58 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
MG S6 EV
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
MG S6 EV
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or MG S6 EV?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 530 km of the MG S6 EV. That is a difference of 149 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the MG S6 EV — its 74.3 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The MG S6 EV takes more: 674 l against 511 l in the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron. The difference is 163 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the MG S6 EV up to 144 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 38 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.