Elaris BEO vs MG S6 EV

Biggest differences: Boot — Elaris BEO 467 l, MG S6 EV 674 l · DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, MG S6 EV 144 kW · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, MG S6 EV 200 km/h.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

MG S6 EV

The MG S6 EV is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering two drive variants with different power outputs and axle configurations.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs MG S6 EV

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or MG S6 EV — who wins where

MG S6 EV leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMG S6 EV +41 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    MG S6 EV
    530
  • Battery kWhElaris BEO +11.7 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    MG S6 EV
    74.3
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMG S6 EV −2.7 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    MG S6 EV
    16.6
  • Power PSMG S6 EV +40 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    MG S6 EV
    244
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    MG S6 EV
    7.3
  • Top speed km/hMG S6 EV +50 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    MG S6 EV
    200
  • DC charging kWMG S6 EV +44 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    MG S6 EV
    144
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    MG S6 EV
    11
  • Weight kgMG S6 EV −47 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    MG S6 EV
    1908
  • Boot lMG S6 EV +207 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    MG S6 EV
    674

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs MG S6 EV

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs MG S6 EV
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
MG S6 EV
RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km530 kmMG +41 km
Battery86 kWh74.3 kWhElaris +11.7 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km16.6 kWh/100 kmMG −2.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW144 kWMG +44 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%38 min 10–80%7 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min9.8 km/minMG +3.3 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS244 PSMG +40 PS
0–100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed150 km/h200 km/hMG +50 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg1908 kgMG −47 kg
Boot467 l674 lMG +207 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly MG
Length4698 mm4708 mmMG +10 mm
Width1908 mm1912 mmMG +4 mm
Height1696 mm1672 mmElaris +24 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2835 mmMG +35 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

MG S6 EV

Cost per 100 km4.98
Monthly62
Yearly747

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

MG S6 EV

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or MG S6 EV?

The MG S6 EV goes further: 530 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 41 km.

Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the MG S6 EV?

The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the MG S6 EV with its 74.3 kWh battery does 530 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 16.6 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the MG S6 EV differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The MG S6 EV has RWD and 244 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the MG S6 EV — its 74.3 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.