Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Lexus RZ
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Lexus RZ 22 kW · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Lexus RZ 150 kW · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, Lexus RZ 224 PS.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Lexus RZ
The Lexus RZ is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering three power and drivetrain options with a WLTP range of up to 568 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Lexus RZ
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Lexus RZ350e
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Lexus RZ — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +111 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +22.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLexus RZ −0.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +50 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +120 kW
- AC charging kWLexus RZ +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −8 min
- Weight ↓ kgLexus RZ −205 kg
- Boot lLexus RZ +11 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Lexus RZ
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Lexus RZ 350e | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 568 km | Audi +111 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 72 kWh | Audi +22.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km | Lexus −0.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 150 kW | Audi +120 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Lexus +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 30 min | Audi −8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 13.3 km/min | Audi +8.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 224 PS | Audi +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.5 s | Audi −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 160 km/h | Audi +50 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 1995 kg | Lexus −205 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 522 l | Lexus +11 l |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4805 mm | Lexus +34 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1895 mm | Audi +44 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1635 mm | Lexus +24 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2850 mm | Audi +43 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Lexus RZ
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Lexus RZ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 568 km of the Lexus RZ. That is a difference of 111 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the Lexus RZ differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Lexus RZ has FWD and 224 PS.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Lexus RZ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 224 PS of the Lexus RZ. The gap is 82 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Lexus RZ up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 30 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.