Elaris BEO vs Lexus RZ

Biggest differences: AC charging — Elaris BEO 11 kW, Lexus RZ 22 kW · DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Lexus RZ 150 kW · Consumption — Elaris BEO 19.3 kWh/100 km, Lexus RZ 14.7 kWh/100 km.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Lexus RZ

The Lexus RZ is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering three power and drivetrain options with a WLTP range of up to 568 kilometers.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Lexus RZ

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Lexus RZ — who wins where

Lexus RZ leads 7 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLexus RZ +79 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Lexus RZ
    568
  • Battery kWhElaris BEO +14 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Lexus RZ
    72
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLexus RZ −4.6 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Lexus RZ
    14.7
  • Power PSLexus RZ +20 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Lexus RZ
    224
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Lexus RZ
    7.5
  • Top speed km/hLexus RZ +10 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Lexus RZ
    160
  • DC charging kWLexus RZ +50 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Lexus RZ
    150
  • AC charging kWLexus RZ +11 kW
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Lexus RZ
    22
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −40 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Lexus RZ
    1995
  • Boot lLexus RZ +55 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Lexus RZ
    522

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Lexus RZ

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Lexus RZ
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Lexus RZ
350e
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km568 kmLexus +79 km
Battery86 kWh72 kWhElaris +14 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km14.7 kWh/100 kmLexus −4.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW150 kWLexus +50 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWLexus +11 kW
Charging 45 min 20–80%30 min 10–80%15 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min13.3 km/minLexus +6.8 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS224 PSLexus +20 PS
0–100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed150 km/h160 km/hLexus +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1955 kg1995 kgElaris −40 kg
Boot467 l522 lLexus +55 l
Length4698 mm4805 mmLexus +107 mm
Width1908 mm1895 mmElaris +13 mm
Height1696 mm1635 mmElaris +61 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2850 mmLexus +50 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Lexus RZ

Cost per 100 km4.41
Monthly55
Yearly661

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Lexus RZ

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Lexus RZ?

The Lexus RZ goes further: 568 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 79 km.

Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Lexus RZ?

The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the Lexus RZ with its 72 kWh battery does 568 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 14.7 kWh/100 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lexus RZ takes more: 522 l against 467 l in the Elaris BEO. The difference is 55 l.

Which charges faster?

The Elaris BEO accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Lexus RZ up to 150 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.