Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Seal U
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, BYD Seal U 140 kW · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, BYD Seal U 9.6 s · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, BYD Seal U 217 PS.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
BYD Seal U
The BYD Seal U is an SUV in the D segment, offering two front-wheel drive variants with different battery capacities and WLTP ranges.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Seal U
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
BYD Seal UDesign 87 kWh
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or BYD Seal U — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +179 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +7.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −5.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +89 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −3 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +35 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +130 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Seal U −53 kg
- Boot lBYD Seal U +41 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs BYD Seal U
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | BYD Seal U Design 87 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 500 km | Audi +179 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 87 kWh | Audi +7.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 20.5 kWh/100 km | Audi −5.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 140 kW | Audi +130 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 28 min 30–80% | 6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 8.9 km/min | Audi +12.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 217 PS | Audi +89 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 9.6 s | Audi −3 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 175 km/h | Audi +35 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2147 kg | BYD −53 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 552 l | BYD +41 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only BYD |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4785 mm | BYD +14 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1890 mm | Audi +49 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1668 mm | BYD +57 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2765 mm | Audi +128 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
BYD Seal U
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
BYD Seal U
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or BYD Seal U?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 500 km of the BYD Seal U. That is a difference of 179 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the BYD Seal U differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The BYD Seal U has FWD and 217 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the BYD Seal U — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or BYD Seal U?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 217 PS of the BYD Seal U. The gap is 89 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.