Audi Q4 e-tron vs SERES 3

Audi Q4 e-tron leads 7 to 0

Biggest differences: WLTP range — Audi Q4 e-tron 563 km, SERES 3 300 km · Power — Audi Q4 e-tron 286 PS, SERES 3 160 PS · Boot — Audi Q4 e-tron 515 l, SERES 3 318 l.

Audi Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 440 to 563 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.

SERES 3

The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: Audi Q4 e-tron vs SERES 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi Q4 e-tron or SERES 3 — who wins where

Audi Q4 e-tron leads 7 to 0

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi Q4 e-tron +263 km
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    563
    SERES 3
    300
  • Battery kWhAudi Q4 e-tron +23 kWh
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    77
    SERES 3
    54
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 e-tron −3.9 kWh/100 km
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    13.7
    SERES 3
    17.6
  • Power PSAudi Q4 e-tron +126 PS
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    286
    SERES 3
    160
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 e-tron −2.3 s
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    6.6
    SERES 3
    8.9
  • Top speed km/hAudi Q4 e-tron +25 km/h
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    180
    SERES 3
    155
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    165
    SERES 3
    —
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    11
    SERES 3
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    —
    SERES 3
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    —
    SERES 3
    1765
  • Boot lAudi Q4 e-tron +197 l
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    515
    SERES 3
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi Q4 e-tron vs SERES 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi Q4 e-tron vs SERES 3
Key parameters Audi Q4 e-tron
e-tron performance
SERES 3
Standard
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range563 km300 kmAudi +263 km
Battery77 kWh54 kWhAudi +23 kWh
Consumption ↓13.7 kWh/100 km17.6 kWh/100 kmAudi −3.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging165 kW——
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓———
Range per minute of charging———
Voltage———
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS160 PSAudi +126 PS
0–100 km/h ↓6.6 s8.9 sAudi −2.3 s
Top speed180 km/h155 km/hAudi +25 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓—1765 kg—
Boot515 l318 lAudi +197 l
Length—4415 mm—
Width—1850 mm—
Height—1650 mm—
Wheelbase———

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi Q4 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.11
Monthly51
Yearly616

SERES 3

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi Q4 e-tron

SERES 3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 e-tron or SERES 3?

The Audi Q4 e-tron goes further: 563 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 263 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 e-tron and the SERES 3 differ?

The Audi Q4 e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The SERES 3 has FWD and 160 PS.

Which is more powerful — Audi Q4 e-tron or SERES 3?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is stronger: 286 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 126 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Audi Q4 e-tron takes more: 515 l against 318 l in the SERES 3. The difference is 197 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.