Audi Q4 e-tron vs SERES 3

Biggest differences: WLTP range — Audi Q4 e-tron 556 km, SERES 3 300 km · Power — Audi Q4 e-tron 286 PS, SERES 3 160 PS · Boot — Audi Q4 e-tron 520 l, SERES 3 318 l.

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges.

SERES 3

The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: Audi Q4 e-tron vs SERES 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi Q4 e-tron or SERES 3 — who wins where

Audi Q4 e-tron leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi Q4 e-tron +256 km
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    556
    SERES 3
    300
  • Battery kWhAudi Q4 e-tron +23 kWh
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    77
    SERES 3
    54
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 e-tron −1.6 kWh/100 km
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    16
    SERES 3
    17.6
  • Power PSAudi Q4 e-tron +126 PS
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    286
    SERES 3
    160
  • 0–100 km/h sAudi Q4 e-tron −2.2 s
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    6.7
    SERES 3
    8.9
  • Top speed km/hAudi Q4 e-tron +25 km/h
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    180
    SERES 3
    155
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    175
    SERES 3
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    11
    SERES 3
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    28
    SERES 3
  • Weight kgSERES 3 −305 kg
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    2070
    SERES 3
    1765
  • Boot lAudi Q4 e-tron +202 l
    Audi Q4 e-tron
    520
    SERES 3
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi Q4 e-tron vs SERES 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi Q4 e-tron vs SERES 3
Key parameters Audi Q4 e-tron
45
SERES 3
Standard
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range556 km300 kmAudi +256 km
Battery77 kWh54 kWhAudi +23 kWh
Consumption16 kWh/100 km17.6 kWh/100 kmAudi −1.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging175 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%28 min
Range per minute of charging13.9 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS160 PSAudi +126 PS
0–100 km/h6.7 s8.9 sAudi −2.2 s
Top speed180 km/h155 km/hAudi +25 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2070 kg1765 kgSERES −305 kg
Boot520 l318 lAudi +202 l
Length4588 mm4415 mmAudi +173 mm
Width1865 mm1850 mmAudi +15 mm
Height1632 mm1650 mmSERES +18 mm
Wheelbase2764 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi Q4 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

SERES 3

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi Q4 e-tron

SERES 3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 e-tron or SERES 3?

The Audi Q4 e-tron goes further: 556 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 256 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 e-tron and the SERES 3 differ?

The Audi Q4 e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The SERES 3 has FWD and 160 PS.

Which is more powerful — Audi Q4 e-tron or SERES 3?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is stronger: 286 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 126 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Audi Q4 e-tron takes more: 520 l against 318 l in the SERES 3. The difference is 202 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.