Audi A6 Avant e-tron vs Zeekr 001
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi A6 Avant e-tron 11 kW, Zeekr 001 22 kW · Charging 10–80% — Audi A6 Avant e-tron 21 min, Zeekr 001 30 min · DC charging — Audi A6 Avant e-tron 270 kW, Zeekr 001 200 kW.
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron is an electric estate in the E segment, offering four drive variants with power ranging from 286 horsepower to 503 horsepower.
Zeekr 001
The Zeekr 001 is an all-electric estate in the E-segment, offering three different powertrain options with power outputs ranging from 272 horsepower to 544 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Audi A6 Avant e-tron vs Zeekr 001
Audi A6 Avant e-tronperformance
Zeekr 001Long Range RWD
Audi A6 Avant e-tron or Zeekr 001 — who wins where
Audi A6 Avant e-tron leads 8 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi A6 Avant e-tron +118 km
- Battery kWhZeekr 001 +5.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A6 Avant e-tron −2.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi A6 Avant e-tron +95 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi A6 Avant e-tron −1.8 s
- Top speed km/hAudi A6 Avant e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi A6 Avant e-tron +70 kW
- AC charging kWZeekr 001 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minAudi A6 Avant e-tron −9 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi A6 Avant e-tron −90 kg
- Boot lZeekr 001 +37 l
Technical data: Audi A6 Avant e-tron vs Zeekr 001
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi A6 Avant e-tronperformance | Zeekr 001Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 738 km | 620 km | Audi +118 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 100 kWh | Zeekr +5.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.4 kWh/100 km | 17.3 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 200 kW | Audi +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Zeekr +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 30 min | Audi −9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 24.6 km/min | 14.5 km/min | Audi +10.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 367 PS | 272 PS | Audi +95 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.4 s | 7.2 s | Audi −1.8 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2185 kg | 2275 kg | Audi −90 kg |
| Boot | 502 l | 539 l | Zeekr +37 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Zeekr |
| Length | 4928 mm | 4955 mm | Zeekr +27 mm |
| Width | 1923 mm | 1999 mm | Zeekr +76 mm |
| Height | 1527 mm | 1560 mm | Zeekr +33 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2946 mm | 2999 mm | Zeekr +53 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
Zeekr 001
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: Estate, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi A6 Avant e-tron or Zeekr 001?
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron goes further: 738 km WLTP against the 620 km of the Zeekr 001. That is a difference of 118 km.
Why does the Zeekr 001 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi A6 Avant e-tron?
The Zeekr 001 carries 100 kWh and covers 620 km, while the Audi A6 Avant e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 738 km. Energy use decides it: 17.3 against 14.4 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Zeekr 001 — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi A6 Avant e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi A6 Avant e-tron or Zeekr 001?
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron is stronger: 367 PS against the 272 PS of the Zeekr 001. The gap is 95 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.

