Audi A6 Avant e-tron vs Zeekr 7GT
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi A6 Avant e-tron 11 kW, Zeekr 7GT 22 kW · DC charging — Audi A6 Avant e-tron 270 kW, Zeekr 7GT 420 kW · Charging 10–80% — Audi A6 Avant e-tron 21 min, Zeekr 7GT 16 min.
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron is an electric estate in the E segment, offering four drive variants with power ranging from 286 horsepower to 503 horsepower.
Zeekr 7GT
The Zeekr 7GT is an electric estate from the E-segment, offering three powertrain variants with power ranging from 421 horsepower to 646 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Audi A6 Avant e-tron vs Zeekr 7GT
Audi A6 Avant e-tronperformance
Zeekr 7GTLong Range RWD
Audi A6 Avant e-tron or Zeekr 7GT — who wins where
Zeekr 7GT leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi A6 Avant e-tron +83 km
- Battery kWhZeekr 7GT +5.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A6 Avant e-tron −2.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSZeekr 7GT +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sZeekr 7GT −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWZeekr 7GT +150 kW
- AC charging kWZeekr 7GT +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minZeekr 7GT −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi A6 Avant e-tron −100 kg
- Boot lAudi A6 Avant e-tron +46 l
Technical data: Audi A6 Avant e-tron vs Zeekr 7GT
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance | Zeekr 7GT Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 738 km | 655 km | Audi +83 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 100 kWh | Zeekr +5.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.4 kWh/100 km | 16.9 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 420 kW | Zeekr +150 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Zeekr +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 16 min | Zeekr −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 24.6 km/min | 28.7 km/min | Zeekr +4.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 367 PS | 421 PS | Zeekr +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.4 s | 5.3 s | Zeekr −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 210 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2185 kg | 2285 kg | Audi −100 kg |
| Boot | 502 l | 456 l | Audi +46 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Zeekr |
| Length | 4928 mm | 4817 mm | Audi +111 mm |
| Width | 1923 mm | 1910 mm | Audi +13 mm |
| Height | 1527 mm | 1456 mm | Audi +71 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2946 mm | 2900 mm | Audi +46 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
Zeekr 7GT
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: Estate, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi A6 Avant e-tron or Zeekr 7GT?
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron goes further: 738 km WLTP against the 655 km of the Zeekr 7GT. That is a difference of 83 km.
Why does the Zeekr 7GT have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi A6 Avant e-tron?
The Zeekr 7GT carries 100 kWh and covers 655 km, while the Audi A6 Avant e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 738 km. Energy use decides it: 16.9 against 14.4 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Zeekr 7GT — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi A6 Avant e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Zeekr 7GT up to 420 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 16 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.