Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer vs Zeekr 7GT
Biggest differences: DC charging — Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer 200 kW, Zeekr 7GT 420 kW · AC charging — Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer 11 kW, Zeekr 7GT 22 kW · Charging 10–80% — Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer 26 min, Zeekr 7GT 16 min.
Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer
The Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer is an electric estate in the E-segment, offering three drive variants with WLTP ranges reaching up to 689 km.
Zeekr 7GT
The Zeekr 7GT is an electric estate from the E-segment, offering three powertrain variants with power ranging from 421 horsepower to 646 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer vs Zeekr 7GT
Volkswagen ID.7 TourerPro S
Zeekr 7GTLong Range RWD
Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer or Zeekr 7GT — who wins where
Zeekr 7GT leads 7 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolkswagen ID.7 Tourer +34 km
- Battery kWhZeekr 7GT +14 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID.7 Tourer −2.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSZeekr 7GT +135 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sZeekr 7GT −1.4 s
- Top speed km/hZeekr 7GT +30 km/h
- DC charging kWZeekr 7GT +220 kW
- AC charging kWZeekr 7GT +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minZeekr 7GT −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgVolkswagen ID.7 Tourer −41 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID.7 Tourer +149 l
Technical data: Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer vs Zeekr 7GT
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer Pro S | Zeekr 7GT Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 689 km | 655 km | Volkswagen +34 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 100 kWh | Zeekr +14 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14 kWh/100 km | 16.9 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −2.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 200 kW | 420 kW | Zeekr +220 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Zeekr +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 26 min | 16 min | Zeekr −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 18.5 km/min | 28.7 km/min | Zeekr +10.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Zeekr +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 421 PS | Zeekr +135 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 5.3 s | Zeekr −1.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 210 km/h | Zeekr +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2244 kg | 2285 kg | Volkswagen −41 kg |
| Boot | 605 l | 456 l | Volkswagen +149 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Zeekr |
| Length | 4961 mm | 4817 mm | Volkswagen +144 mm |
| Width | 1862 mm | 1910 mm | Zeekr +48 mm |
| Height | 1551 mm | 1456 mm | Volkswagen +95 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2971 mm | 2900 mm | Volkswagen +71 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer
Zeekr 7GT
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer
Other comparisons in this class: Estate, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer or Zeekr 7GT?
The Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer goes further: 689 km WLTP against the 655 km of the Zeekr 7GT. That is a difference of 34 km.
Why does the Zeekr 7GT have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer?
The Zeekr 7GT carries 100 kWh and covers 655 km, while the Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer with its 86 kWh battery does 689 km. Energy use decides it: 16.9 against 14 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Zeekr 7GT — its 100 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer or Zeekr 7GT?
The Zeekr 7GT is stronger: 421 PS against the 286 PS of the Volkswagen ID.7 Tourer. The gap is 135 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.