Audi A2 e-tron vs Leapmotor B05

Audi A2 e-tron leads 6 to 3

Biggest differences: WLTP range — Audi A2 e-tron 646 km, Leapmotor B05 482 km · Battery — Audi A2 e-tron 79 kWh, Leapmotor B05 67.1 kWh · Boot — Audi A2 e-tron 396 l, Leapmotor B05 345 l.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

Leapmotor B05

Leapmotor B05 is a C-segment hatchback, in model year 2026 in two variants with 218 hp: WLTP range from 401 to 482 km.

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs Leapmotor B05

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or Leapmotor B05 — who wins where

Audi A2 e-tron leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +164 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    Leapmotor B05
    482
  • Battery kWhAudi A2 e-tron +11.9 kWh
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    Leapmotor B05
    67.1
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A2 e-tron −2 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    Leapmotor B05
    15.9
  • Power PSAudi A2 e-tron +13 PS
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    Leapmotor B05
    218
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sLeapmotor B05 −0.3 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    Leapmotor B05
    6.7
  • Top speed km/hLeapmotor B05 +10 km/h
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    Leapmotor B05
    170
  • DC charging kWAudi A2 e-tron +15 kW
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    Leapmotor B05
    168
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    Leapmotor B05
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgLeapmotor B05 −73 kg
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    Leapmotor B05
    1837
  • Boot lAudi A2 e-tron +51 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    Leapmotor B05
    345

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Leapmotor B05

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Leapmotor B05
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
Leapmotor B05
Design 67 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km482 kmAudi +164 km
Battery79 kWh67.1 kWhAudi +11.9 kWh
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km15.9 kWh/100 kmAudi −2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW168 kWAudi +15 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠29 min 10–80%17 min 30–80%12 min
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min14.2 km/minAudi +1.4 km/min
Voltage———
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS218 PSAudi +13 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s6.7 sLeapmotor −0.3 s
Top speed160 km/h170 km/hLeapmotor +10 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg1837 kgLeapmotor −73 kg
Boot396 l345 lAudi +51 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length—4430 mm—
Width—1880 mm—
Height—1520 mm—
Wheelbase—2735 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Leapmotor B05

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

Leapmotor B05

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or Leapmotor B05?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 482 km of the Leapmotor B05. That is a difference of 164 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Audi A2 e-tron takes more: 396 l against 345 l in the Leapmotor B05. The difference is 51 l.

Which charges faster?

The Audi A2 e-tron accepts up to 183 kW DC, the Leapmotor B05 up to 168 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Audi A2 e-tron uses less electricity: 13.9 kWh/100 km against 15.9 kWh/100 km in the Leapmotor B05. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 300 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.