Volvo EX30 vs Zeekr X

Biggest differences: Power — Volvo EX30 272 PS, Zeekr X 496 PS · 0–100 km/h — Volvo EX30 5.3 s, Zeekr X 3.7 s · DC charging — Volvo EX30 175 kW, Zeekr X 150 kW.

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Zeekr X

Electric B-segment SUV offered in three drivetrain configurations, differing in battery capacity and performance.

Profile against the market: Volvo EX30 vs Zeekr X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Volvo EX30 or Zeekr X — who wins where

Zeekr X leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +60 km
    Volvo EX30
    475
    Zeekr X
    415
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Volvo EX30
    69
    Zeekr X
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmZeekr X −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Volvo EX30
    17
    Zeekr X
    16.8
  • Power PSZeekr X +224 PS
    Volvo EX30
    272
    Zeekr X
    496
  • 0–100 km/h sZeekr X −1.6 s
    Volvo EX30
    5.3
    Zeekr X
    3.7
  • Top speed km/hZeekr X +10 km/h
    Volvo EX30
    180
    Zeekr X
    190
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +25 kW
    Volvo EX30
    175
    Zeekr X
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Volvo EX30
    11
    Zeekr X
    11
  • Charging minVolvo EX30 −3 min
    Volvo EX30
    27
    Zeekr X
    30
  • Weight kgVolvo EX30 −185 kg
    Volvo EX30
    1775
    Zeekr X
    1960
  • Boot lZeekr X +44 l
    Volvo EX30
    318
    Zeekr X
    362

Add a third car

Technical data: Volvo EX30 vs Zeekr X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Volvo EX30 vs Zeekr X
Key parameters Volvo EX30
P5 Long Range
Zeekr X
Privilege AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range475 km415 kmVolvo +60 km
Battery69 kWh69 kWhNo difference
Consumption17 kWh/100 km16.8 kWh/100 kmZeekr −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging175 kW150 kWVolvo +25 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%27 min30 minVolvo −3 min
Range per minute of charging12.3 km/min9.7 km/minVolvo +2.6 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power272 PS496 PSZeekr +224 PS
0–100 km/h5.3 s3.7 sZeekr −1.6 s
Top speed180 km/h190 km/hZeekr +10 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1775 kg1960 kgVolvo −185 kg
Boot318 l362 lZeekr +44 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Zeekr
Length4233 mm4432 mmZeekr +199 mm
Width1837 mm1836 mmVolvo +1 mm
Height1549 mm1566 mmZeekr +17 mm
Wheelbase2650 mm2750 mmZeekr +100 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Volvo EX30

Cost per 100 km5.1
Monthly64
Yearly765

Zeekr X

Cost per 100 km5.04
Monthly63
Yearly756

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Volvo EX30

Zeekr X

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Volvo EX30 or Zeekr X?

The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 415 km of the Zeekr X. That is a difference of 60 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Volvo EX30 and the Zeekr X differ?

The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS. The Zeekr X has AWD and 496 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Zeekr X — its 69 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX30, with 69 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Volvo EX30 or Zeekr X?

The Zeekr X is stronger: 496 PS against the 272 PS of the Volvo EX30. The gap is 224 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.