Subaru E-Outback vs Subaru Solterra
Biggest differences: Power — Subaru E-Outback 381 PS, Subaru Solterra 218 PS · 0–100 km/h — Subaru E-Outback 4.5 s, Subaru Solterra 6.9 s · Boot — Subaru E-Outback 619 l, Subaru Solterra 452 l.
Subaru E-Outback
The Subaru E-Outback is an SUV in the D segment, offering all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of 526 kilometers.
Subaru Solterra
The Subaru Solterra is a compact SUV with AWD and a WLTP range of 466 km.
Profile against the market: Subaru E-Outback vs Subaru Solterra
Subaru E-OutbackAWD 280 kW- Subaru SolterraAWD
Subaru E-Outback or Subaru Solterra — who wins where
Subaru E-Outback leads 7 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru E-Outback +60 km
- Battery kWhSubaru Solterra +0.4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSubaru E-Outback −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSubaru E-Outback +163 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSubaru E-Outback −2.4 s
- Top speed km/hSubaru E-Outback +20 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minSubaru E-Outback −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgNo difference
- Boot lSubaru E-Outback +167 l
Technical data: Subaru E-Outback vs Subaru Solterra
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Subaru E-Outback AWD 280 kW | Subaru Solterra AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 526 km | 466 km | Subaru +60 km |
| Battery | 71 kWh | 71.4 kWh | Subaru +0.4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 15.4 kWh/100 km | Subaru −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 150 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 30 min | Subaru −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.2 km/min | 10.9 km/min | Subaru +2.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 381 PS | 218 PS | Subaru +163 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.5 s | 6.9 s | Subaru −2.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Subaru +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2010 kg | 2010 kg | No difference |
| Boot | 619 l | 452 l | Subaru +167 l |
| Length | 4845 mm | 4690 mm | Subaru +155 mm |
| Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm | No difference |
| Height | 1675 mm | 1650 mm | Subaru +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2850 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Subaru E-Outback
Subaru Solterra
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Subaru E-Outback
Subaru Solterra
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Subaru E-Outback or Subaru Solterra?
The Subaru E-Outback goes further: 526 km WLTP against the 466 km of the Subaru Solterra. That is a difference of 60 km.
Why does the Subaru Solterra have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Subaru E-Outback?
The Subaru Solterra carries 71.4 kWh and covers 466 km, while the Subaru E-Outback with its 71 kWh battery does 526 km. Energy use decides it: 15.4 against 15.3 kWh/100 km.
Which is more powerful — Subaru E-Outback or Subaru Solterra?
The Subaru E-Outback is stronger: 381 PS against the 218 PS of the Subaru Solterra. The gap is 163 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Subaru E-Outback takes more: 619 l against 452 l in the Subaru Solterra. The difference is 167 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.