Subaru E-Outback vs Subaru Solterra
Subaru E-Outback leads 6 to 3
Biggest differences: AC charging — Subaru E-Outback 11 kW, Subaru Solterra 22 kW · Boot — Subaru E-Outback 619 l, Subaru Solterra 421 l · 0–100 km/h — Subaru E-Outback 4.5 s, Subaru Solterra 5.1 s.
Subaru E-Outback
The Subaru E-Outback is an SUV in the D segment, offering all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of 526 kilometers.
Subaru Solterra
Subaru Solterra is a D-segment SUV with all-wheel drive, in model year 2026 with 343 hp and a WLTP range of 511 km.
Profile against the market: Subaru E-Outback vs Subaru Solterra
Subaru E-OutbackAWD 280 kW- Subaru SolterraAWD · 2026 model year
Subaru E-Outback or Subaru Solterra — who wins where
Subaru E-Outback leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru E-Outback +15 km
- Battery kWhSubaru Solterra +2.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSubaru Solterra −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSubaru E-Outback +38 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSubaru E-Outback −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hSubaru E-Outback +20 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWSubaru Solterra +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgSubaru E-Outback −107 kg
- Boot lSubaru E-Outback +198 l
Technical data: Subaru E-Outback vs Subaru Solterra
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Subaru E-Outback AWD 280 kW | Subaru Solterra AWD · 2026 model year | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 526 km | 511 km | Subaru +15 km |
| Battery | 71 kWh | 73.1 kWh | Subaru +2.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 14.3 kWh/100 km | Subaru −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 150 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Subaru +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 28 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.2 km/min | 12.8 km/min | Subaru +0.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 381 PS | 343 PS | Subaru +38 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.5 s | 5.1 s | Subaru −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Subaru +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2010 kg | 2117 kg | Subaru −107 kg |
| Boot | 619 l | 421 l | Subaru +198 l |
| Length | 4845 mm | — | — |
| Width | 1860 mm | — | — |
| Height | 1675 mm | — | — |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Subaru E-Outback
Subaru Solterra
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Subaru E-Outback
Subaru Solterra
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Subaru E-Outback or Subaru Solterra?
The Subaru E-Outback goes further: 526 km WLTP against the 511 km of the Subaru Solterra. That is a difference of 15 km.
Why does the Subaru Solterra have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Subaru E-Outback?
The Subaru Solterra carries 73.1 kWh and covers 511 km, while the Subaru E-Outback with its 71 kWh battery does 526 km. Energy use decides it: 14.3 against 15.3 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Subaru E-Outback takes more: 619 l against 421 l in the Subaru Solterra. The difference is 198 l.
Which charges faster?
The Subaru E-Outback accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Subaru Solterra up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.