SERES 5 vs Subaru Solterra

Biggest differences: Power — SERES 5 490 PS, Subaru Solterra 218 PS · 0–100 km/h — SERES 5 4.5 s, Subaru Solterra 6.9 s · DC charging — SERES 5 100 kW, Subaru Solterra 150 kW.

SERES 5

The SERES 5 is a D-segment SUV with all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of up to 480 kilometers, offering a power output of 490 horsepower.

Subaru Solterra

The Subaru Solterra is a compact SUV with AWD and a WLTP range of 466 km.

Profile against the market: SERES 5 vs Subaru Solterra

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

SERES 5 or Subaru Solterra — who wins where

SERES 5 leads 5 to 3

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmSERES 5 +14 km
    SERES 5
    480
    Subaru Solterra
    466
  • Battery kWhSERES 5 +8.6 kWh
    SERES 5
    80
    Subaru Solterra
    71.4
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmSubaru Solterra −0.7 kWh/100 km
    SERES 5
    16.1
    Subaru Solterra
    15.4
  • Power PSSERES 5 +272 PS
    SERES 5
    490
    Subaru Solterra
    218
  • 0–100 km/h sSERES 5 −2.4 s
    SERES 5
    4.5
    Subaru Solterra
    6.9
  • Top speed km/hSERES 5 +40 km/h
    SERES 5
    200
    Subaru Solterra
    160
  • DC charging kWSubaru Solterra +50 kW
    SERES 5
    100
    Subaru Solterra
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    SERES 5
    11
    Subaru Solterra
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    SERES 5
    Subaru Solterra
    30
  • Weight kgNo data
    SERES 5
    Subaru Solterra
    2010
  • Boot lSubaru Solterra +2 l
    SERES 5
    450
    Subaru Solterra
    452

Add a third car

Technical data: SERES 5 vs Subaru Solterra

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: SERES 5 vs Subaru Solterra
Key parameters SERES 5
Long Range AWD
Subaru Solterra
AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range480 km466 kmSERES +14 km
Battery80 kWh71.4 kWhSERES +8.6 kWh
Consumption16.1 kWh/100 km15.4 kWh/100 kmSubaru −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW150 kWSubaru +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min
Range per minute of charging10.9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power490 PS218 PSSERES +272 PS
0–100 km/h4.5 s6.9 sSERES −2.4 s
Top speed200 km/h160 km/hSERES +40 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2010 kg
Boot450 l452 lSubaru +2 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly SERES
Length4700 mm4690 mmSERES +10 mm
Width1930 mm1860 mmSERES +70 mm
Height1625 mm1650 mmSubaru +25 mm
Wheelbase2880 mm2850 mmSERES +30 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

SERES 5

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Subaru Solterra

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

SERES 5

Subaru Solterra

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — SERES 5 or Subaru Solterra?

The SERES 5 goes further: 480 km WLTP against the 466 km of the Subaru Solterra. That is a difference of 14 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the SERES 5 — its 80 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Subaru Solterra, with 71.4 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — SERES 5 or Subaru Solterra?

The SERES 5 is stronger: 490 PS against the 218 PS of the Subaru Solterra. The gap is 272 PS.

Which charges faster?

The SERES 5 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Subaru Solterra up to 150 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.