Opel Grandland Electric vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Opel Grandland Electric 8.8 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s · Battery — Opel Grandland Electric 96.9 kWh, Škoda Elroq 77 kWh · Power — Opel Grandland Electric 231 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS.
Opel Grandland Electric
Opel Grandland Electric is a C-segment SUV offering two different powertrain sets with different battery capacities and performance characteristics.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Opel Grandland Electric vs Škoda Elroq
Opel Grandland ElectricLong Range (97 kWh)
Škoda Elroq85
Opel Grandland Electric or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmOpel Grandland Electric +121 km
- Battery kWhOpel Grandland Electric +19.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −3.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −2.2 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWOpel Grandland Electric +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Elroq −130 kg
- Boot lOpel Grandland Electric +80 l
Technical data: Opel Grandland Electric vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Opel Grandland Electric Long Range (97 kWh) | Škoda Elroq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 694 km | 573 km | Opel +121 km |
| Battery | 96.9 kWh | 77 kWh | Opel +19.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −3.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 135 kW | Opel +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 15.4 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Opel +1.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.8 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −2.2 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2180 kg | 2050 kg | Škoda −130 kg |
| Boot | 550 l | 470 l | Opel +80 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Opel |
| Length | 4650 mm | 4488 mm | Opel +162 mm |
| Width | 1934 mm | 1884 mm | Opel +50 mm |
| Height | 1665 mm | 1625 mm | Opel +40 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2784 mm | 2765 mm | Opel +19 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Opel Grandland Electric
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Opel Grandland Electric
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Opel Grandland Electric or Škoda Elroq?
The Opel Grandland Electric goes further: 694 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 121 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Opel Grandland Electric and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Opel Grandland Electric has FWD and 231 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Opel Grandland Electric — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Opel Grandland Electric takes more: 550 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 80 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.