Lucid Air vs Tesla Model S

Biggest differences: AC charging — Lucid Air 22 kW, Tesla Model S 11 kW · WLTP range — Lucid Air 960 km, Tesla Model S 634 km · Boot — Lucid Air 627 l, Tesla Model S 793 l.

Lucid Air

The Lucid Air is a sedan in the F-segment, offering four high-performance powertrain options and a range of up to 960 km in the WLTP cycle.

Tesla Model S

The Tesla Model S is a sedan in the F segment, offering two all-wheel drive (AWD) variants with high performance and long range.

Profile against the market: Lucid Air vs Tesla Model S

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lucid Air or Tesla Model S — who wins where

Lucid Air leads 8 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLucid Air +326 km
    Lucid Air
    960
    Tesla Model S
    634
  • Battery kWhLucid Air +17 kWh
    Lucid Air
    117
    Tesla Model S
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLucid Air −1.3 kWh/100 km
    Lucid Air
    13.5
    Tesla Model S
    14.8
  • Power PSLucid Air +161 PS
    Lucid Air
    831
    Tesla Model S
    670
  • 0–100 km/h sLucid Air −0.2 s
    Lucid Air
    3
    Tesla Model S
    3.2
  • Top speed km/hLucid Air +20 km/h
    Lucid Air
    270
    Tesla Model S
    250
  • DC charging kWLucid Air +50 kW
    Lucid Air
    300
    Tesla Model S
    250
  • AC charging kWLucid Air +11 kW
    Lucid Air
    22
    Tesla Model S
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Lucid Air
    Tesla Model S
  • Weight kgTesla Model S −291 kg
    Lucid Air
    2360
    Tesla Model S
    2069
  • Boot lTesla Model S +166 l
    Lucid Air
    627
    Tesla Model S
    793

Add a third car

Technical data: Lucid Air vs Tesla Model S

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lucid Air vs Tesla Model S
Key parameters Lucid Air
Grand Touring
Tesla Model S
Dual Motor AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range960 km634 kmLucid +326 km
Battery117 kWh100 kWhLucid +17 kWh
Consumption13.5 kWh/100 km14.8 kWh/100 kmLucid −1.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging300 kW250 kWLucid +50 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWLucid +11 kW
Charging 10–80%
Range per minute of charging
Voltage800 V400 VLucid +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power831 PS670 PSLucid +161 PS
0–100 km/h3 s3.2 sLucid −0.2 s
Top speed270 km/h250 km/hLucid +20 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2360 kg2069 kgTesla −291 kg
Boot627 l793 lTesla +166 l
Length4975 mm5021 mmTesla +46 mm
Width1939 mm1987 mmTesla +48 mm
Height1410 mm1431 mmTesla +21 mm
Wheelbase2960 mm2960 mmNo difference

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lucid Air

Cost per 100 km4.05
Monthly51
Yearly608

Tesla Model S

Cost per 100 km4.44
Monthly56
Yearly666

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lucid Air

Tesla Model S

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lucid Air or Tesla Model S?

The Lucid Air goes further: 960 km WLTP against the 634 km of the Tesla Model S. That is a difference of 326 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Tesla Model S takes more: 793 l against 627 l in the Lucid Air. The difference is 166 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lucid Air accepts up to 300 kW DC, the Tesla Model S up to 250 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Lucid Air uses less electricity: 13.5 kWh/100 km against 14.8 kWh/100 km in the Tesla Model S. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 195 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.