Hyundai IONIQ 3 vs Lancia Ypsilon
Biggest differences: AC charging — Hyundai IONIQ 3 11 kW, Lancia Ypsilon 7.4 kW · Boot — Hyundai IONIQ 3 441 l, Lancia Ypsilon 309 l · Battery — Hyundai IONIQ 3 61 kWh, Lancia Ypsilon 51 kWh.
Hyundai IONIQ 3
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 is an all-electric hatchback in the B-segment, available with two front-wheel drive variants offering different battery configurations and power outputs.
Lancia Ypsilon
The Lancia Ypsilon is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with two electric powertrain configurations offering different power outputs and performance characteristics.
Profile against the market: Hyundai IONIQ 3 vs Lancia Ypsilon
Hyundai IONIQ 3Long Range
Lancia YpsilonElectric
Hyundai IONIQ 3 or Lancia Ypsilon — who wins where
Hyundai IONIQ 3 leads 8 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmHyundai IONIQ 3 +72 km
- Battery kWhHyundai IONIQ 3 +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmHyundai IONIQ 3 −0.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLancia Ypsilon +21 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLancia Ypsilon −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai IONIQ 3 +15 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai IONIQ 3 +15 kW
- AC charging kWHyundai IONIQ 3 +3.6 kW
- Charging ↓ minLancia Ypsilon −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgHyundai IONIQ 3 −6 kg
- Boot lHyundai IONIQ 3 +132 l
Technical data: Hyundai IONIQ 3 vs Lancia Ypsilon
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai IONIQ 3 Long Range | Lancia Ypsilon Electric | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 497 km | 425 km | Hyundai +72 km |
| Battery | 61 kWh | 51 kWh | Hyundai +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.8 kWh/100 km | 14.4 kWh/100 km | Hyundai −0.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 115 kW | 100 kW | Hyundai +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 7.4 kW | Hyundai +3.6 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 28 min | Lancia −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.6 km/min | 10.6 km/min | Hyundai +1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 135 PS | 156 PS | Lancia +21 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9.6 s | 9 s | Lancia −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 165 km/h | 150 km/h | Hyundai +15 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1555 kg | 1561 kg | Hyundai −6 kg |
| Boot | 441 l | 309 l | Hyundai +132 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Hyundai |
| Length | 4155 mm | 4080 mm | Hyundai +75 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1768 mm | Hyundai +32 mm |
| Height | 1505 mm | 1440 mm | Hyundai +65 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2680 mm | 2545 mm | Hyundai +135 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai IONIQ 3
Lancia Ypsilon
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai IONIQ 3
Lancia Ypsilon
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Hyundai IONIQ 3 or Lancia Ypsilon?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 goes further: 497 km WLTP against the 425 km of the Lancia Ypsilon. That is a difference of 72 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Hyundai IONIQ 3 — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Lancia Ypsilon, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 takes more: 441 l against 309 l in the Lancia Ypsilon. The difference is 132 l.
Which charges faster?
The Hyundai IONIQ 3 accepts up to 115 kW DC, the Lancia Ypsilon up to 100 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.