Hyundai Inster vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Biggest differences: Battery — Hyundai Inster 49 kWh, Renault Twingo E-Tech 27.5 kWh · DC charging — Hyundai Inster 85.3 kW, Renault Twingo E-Tech 50 kW · Power — Hyundai Inster 115 PS, Renault Twingo E-Tech 80 PS.
Hyundai Inster
The Hyundai Inster is a city hatchback in the A-segment, offering three powertrain options with WLTP ranges from 327 km to 370 km.
Renault Twingo E-Tech
The Renault Twingo E-Tech is a city hatchback in the A segment, offering a range of 263 kilometers and compact dimensions.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Inster vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Hyundai InsterLong Range
Renault Twingo E-Tech27.5 kWh
Hyundai Inster or Renault Twingo E-Tech — who wins where
Hyundai Inster leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmHyundai Inster +107 km
- Battery kWhHyundai Inster +21.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault Twingo E-Tech −2.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai Inster +35 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sHyundai Inster −1.5 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Inster +20 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai Inster +35.3 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Twingo E-Tech −200 kg
- Boot lRenault Twingo E-Tech +80 l
Technical data: Hyundai Inster vs Renault Twingo E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Inster Long Range | Renault Twingo E-Tech 27.5 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 370 km | 263 km | Hyundai +107 km |
| Battery | 49 kWh | 27.5 kWh | Hyundai +21.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 12.2 kWh/100 km | Renault −2.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 85.3 kW | 50 kW | Hyundai +35.3 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 30 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.6 km/min | 6.1 km/min | Hyundai +2.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 115 PS | 80 PS | Hyundai +35 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 10.6 s | 12.1 s | Hyundai −1.5 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 130 km/h | Hyundai +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1400 kg | 1200 kg | Renault −200 kg |
| Boot | 280 l | 360 l | Renault +80 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 3825 mm | 3789 mm | Hyundai +36 mm |
| Width | 1610 mm | 1720 mm | Renault +110 mm |
| Height | 1575 mm | 1495 mm | Hyundai +80 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2580 mm | 2500 mm | Hyundai +80 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Inster
Renault Twingo E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Inster
Renault Twingo E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment A
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Hyundai Inster or Renault Twingo E-Tech?
The Hyundai Inster goes further: 370 km WLTP against the 263 km of the Renault Twingo E-Tech. That is a difference of 107 km.
Which is more powerful — Hyundai Inster or Renault Twingo E-Tech?
The Hyundai Inster is stronger: 115 PS against the 80 PS of the Renault Twingo E-Tech. The gap is 35 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Renault Twingo E-Tech takes more: 360 l against 280 l in the Hyundai Inster. The difference is 80 l.
Which charges faster?
The Hyundai Inster accepts up to 85.3 kW DC, the Renault Twingo E-Tech up to 50 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 30 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.