Ford Capri vs Ford Explorer

It's a tie: 1 to 1

Biggest differences: Consumption — Ford Capri 13.8 kWh/100 km, Ford Explorer 13.1 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — Ford Capri 627 km, Ford Explorer 602 km.

Ford Capri

The Ford Capri is a D-segment SUV offering three variants with rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, and a range of up to 627 kilometers.

Ford Explorer

Ford Explorer is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2027 in three variants: WLTP range from 444 to 602 km, power from 190 to 340 hp.

Profile against the market: Ford Capri vs Ford Explorer

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Ford Capri or Ford Explorer — who wins where

It's a tie: 1 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmFord Capri +25 km
    Ford Capri
    627
    Ford Explorer
    602
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Ford Capri
    79
    Ford Explorer
    79
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Explorer −0.7 kWh/100 km
    Ford Capri
    13.8
    Ford Explorer
    13.1
  • Power PSNo difference
    Ford Capri
    286
    Ford Explorer
    286
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
    Ford Capri
    6.4
    Ford Explorer
    6.4
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Ford Capri
    180
    Ford Explorer
    180
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Ford Capri
    183
    Ford Explorer
    183
  • AC charging kWNo data
    Ford Capri
    11
    Ford Explorer
    —
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    Ford Capri
    29
    Ford Explorer
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    Ford Capri
    2023
    Ford Explorer
    —
  • Boot lNo data
    Ford Capri
    572
    Ford Explorer
    —

Add a third car

Technical data: Ford Capri vs Ford Explorer

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Ford Capri vs Ford Explorer
Key parameters Ford Capri
Extended Range RWD
Ford Explorer
Extended Range RWD · 2027 model year
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range627 km602 kmFord +25 km
Battery79 kWh79 kWhNo difference
Consumption ↓13.8 kWh/100 km13.1 kWh/100 kmFord −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW183 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW——
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min——
Range per minute of charging15.1 km/min——
Voltage400 V——
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS286 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h ↓6.4 s6.4 sNo difference
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2023 kg——
Boot572 l——
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Ford
Length4634 mm——
Width1872 mm——
Height1627 mm——
Wheelbase2767 mm——

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Ford Capri

Cost per 100 km4.14
Monthly52
Yearly621

Ford Explorer

Cost per 100 km3.93
Monthly49
Yearly589

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Ford Capri

Ford Explorer

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Ford Capri or Ford Explorer?

The Ford Capri goes further: 627 km WLTP against the 602 km of the Ford Explorer. That is a difference of 25 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Ford Capri — its 79 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Explorer, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Ford Capri accepts up to 183 kW DC, the Ford Explorer up to 183 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Ford Explorer uses less electricity: 13.1 kWh/100 km against 13.8 kWh/100 km in the Ford Capri. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.