Elaris BEO vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 400 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 510 PS · AC charging — Elaris BEO 11 kW, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 22 kW.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country is a D-segment SUV offering two all-wheel drive variants and high performance.
Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
- Elaris BEOStandard
Volvo EX60 Cross CountryP10 AWD
Elaris BEO or Volvo EX60 Cross Country — who wins where
Volvo EX60 Cross Country leads 8 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX60 Cross Country +151 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 Cross Country +4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolvo EX60 Cross Country −3.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 Cross Country +306 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hVolvo EX60 Cross Country +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX60 Cross Country +300 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EX60 Cross Country +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgElaris BEO −340 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX60 Cross Country +56 l
Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Elaris BEO Standard | Volvo EX60 Cross Country P10 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 489 km | 640 km | Volvo +151 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 90 kWh | Volvo +4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Volvo −3.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 400 kW | Volvo +300 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Volvo +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 20–80% | 18 min 10–80% | 27 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.5 km/min | 24.9 km/min | Volvo +18.4 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 510 PS | Volvo +306 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 4.7 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 180 km/h | Volvo +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1955 kg | 2295 kg | Elaris −340 kg |
| Boot | 467 l | 523 l | Volvo +56 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4698 mm | 4803 mm | Volvo +105 mm |
| Width | 1908 mm | 1899 mm | Elaris +9 mm |
| Height | 1696 mm | 1635 mm | Elaris +61 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2800 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +170 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Elaris BEO
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Elaris BEO
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Volvo EX60 Cross Country?
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country goes further: 640 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 151 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Volvo EX60 Cross Country differ?
The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Volvo EX60 Cross Country has AWD and 510 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX60 Cross Country — its 90 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Volvo EX60 Cross Country?
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country is stronger: 510 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 306 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.