Elaris BEO vs Porsche Macan

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Porsche Macan 270 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Porsche Macan 360 PS · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, Porsche Macan 220 km/h.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Porsche Macan

The electric SUV, belonging to the D segment, is offered in five different powertrain configurations, with power ranging from 360 horsepower to 639 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Porsche Macan

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Porsche Macan — who wins where

Porsche Macan leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPorsche Macan +152 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Porsche Macan
    641
  • Battery kWhPorsche Macan +9 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Porsche Macan
    95
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPorsche Macan −2.3 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Porsche Macan
    17
  • Power PSPorsche Macan +156 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Porsche Macan
    360
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Porsche Macan
    5.7
  • Top speed km/hPorsche Macan +70 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Porsche Macan
    220
  • DC charging kWPorsche Macan +170 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Porsche Macan
    270
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Porsche Macan
    11
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −265 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Porsche Macan
    2220
  • Boot lPorsche Macan +73 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Porsche Macan
    540

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Porsche Macan

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Porsche Macan
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Porsche Macan
Macan
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km641 kmPorsche +152 km
Battery86 kWh95 kWhPorsche +9 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km17 kWh/100 kmPorsche −2.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW270 kWPorsche +170 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%21 min 10–80%24 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min21.4 km/minPorsche +14.9 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS360 PSPorsche +156 PS
0–100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed150 km/h220 km/hPorsche +70 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2220 kgElaris −265 kg
Boot467 l540 lPorsche +73 l
Length4698 mm4784 mmPorsche +86 mm
Width1908 mm1938 mmPorsche +30 mm
Height1696 mm1623 mmElaris +73 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2893 mmPorsche +93 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Porsche Macan

Cost per 100 km5.1
Monthly64
Yearly765

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Porsche Macan

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Porsche Macan?

The Porsche Macan goes further: 641 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 152 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Porsche Macan differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Porsche Macan has RWD and 360 PS.

Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Porsche Macan?

The Porsche Macan is stronger: 360 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 156 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Porsche Macan takes more: 540 l against 467 l in the Elaris BEO. The difference is 73 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.