Ford Capri vs Porsche Macan
Biggest differences: DC charging — Ford Capri 183 kW, Porsche Macan 270 kW · Charging 10–80% — Ford Capri 29 min, Porsche Macan 21 min · Power — Ford Capri 286 PS, Porsche Macan 360 PS.
Ford Capri
The Ford Capri is a D-segment SUV offering three variants with rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, and a range of up to 627 kilometers.
Porsche Macan
The electric SUV, belonging to the D segment, is offered in five different powertrain configurations, with power ranging from 360 horsepower to 639 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Ford Capri vs Porsche Macan
Ford CapriExtended Range RWD- Porsche MacanMacan
Ford Capri or Porsche Macan — who wins where
Porsche Macan leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPorsche Macan +14 km
- Battery kWhPorsche Macan +16 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Capri −3.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPorsche Macan +74 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPorsche Macan −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hPorsche Macan +40 km/h
- DC charging kWPorsche Macan +87 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minPorsche Macan −8 min
- Weight ↓ kgFord Capri −197 kg
- Boot lFord Capri +32 l
Technical data: Ford Capri vs Porsche Macan
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Capri Extended Range RWD | Porsche Macan Macan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 627 km | 641 km | Porsche +14 km |
| Battery | 79 kWh | 95 kWh | Porsche +16 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.8 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | Ford −3.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 183 kW | 270 kW | Porsche +87 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 21 min | Porsche −8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 15.1 km/min | 21.4 km/min | Porsche +6.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Porsche +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 360 PS | Porsche +74 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.4 s | 5.7 s | Porsche −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 220 km/h | Porsche +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2023 kg | 2220 kg | Ford −197 kg |
| Boot | 572 l | 540 l | Ford +32 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Ford |
| Length | 4634 mm | 4784 mm | Porsche +150 mm |
| Width | 1872 mm | 1938 mm | Porsche +66 mm |
| Height | 1627 mm | 1623 mm | Ford +4 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2767 mm | 2893 mm | Porsche +126 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Capri
Porsche Macan
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Capri
Porsche Macan
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford Capri or Porsche Macan?
The Porsche Macan goes further: 641 km WLTP against the 627 km of the Ford Capri. That is a difference of 14 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Ford Capri — its 79 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Porsche Macan, with 95 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Ford Capri accepts up to 183 kW DC, the Porsche Macan up to 270 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 21 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Ford Capri uses less electricity: 13.8 kWh/100 km against 17 kWh/100 km in the Porsche Macan. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 480 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.