DS 3 E-Tense vs Volvo EX30

Biggest differences: DC charging — DS 3 E-Tense 100 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · Power — DS 3 E-Tense 156 PS, Volvo EX30 272 PS · 0–100 km/h — DS 3 E-Tense 9 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.

DS 3 E-Tense

An all-electric crossover in the B-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 402 km according to the WLTP cycle.

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Profile against the market: DS 3 E-Tense vs Volvo EX30

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

DS 3 E-Tense or Volvo EX30 — who wins where

Volvo EX30 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +73 km
    DS 3 E-Tense
    402
    Volvo EX30
    475
  • Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +15 kWh
    DS 3 E-Tense
    54
    Volvo EX30
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmDS 3 E-Tense −1.5 kWh/100 km
    DS 3 E-Tense
    15.5
    Volvo EX30
    17
  • Power PSVolvo EX30 +116 PS
    DS 3 E-Tense
    156
    Volvo EX30
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo EX30 −3.7 s
    DS 3 E-Tense
    9
    Volvo EX30
    5.3
  • Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +30 km/h
    DS 3 E-Tense
    150
    Volvo EX30
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +75 kW
    DS 3 E-Tense
    100
    Volvo EX30
    175
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    DS 3 E-Tense
    11
    Volvo EX30
    11
  • Weight kgDS 3 E-Tense −185 kg
    DS 3 E-Tense
    1590
    Volvo EX30
    1775
  • Boot lDS 3 E-Tense +32 l
    DS 3 E-Tense
    350
    Volvo EX30
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: DS 3 E-Tense vs Volvo EX30

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: DS 3 E-Tense vs Volvo EX30
Key parameters DS 3 E-Tense
E-Tense 156
Volvo EX30
P5 Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range402 km475 kmVolvo +73 km
Battery54 kWh69 kWhVolvo +15 kWh
Consumption15.5 kWh/100 km17 kWh/100 kmDS −1.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW175 kWVolvo +75 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 25 min 0–80%27 min 10–80%2 min
Range per minute of charging12.9 km/min12.3 km/minDS +0.6 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS272 PSVolvo +116 PS
0–100 km/h9 s5.3 sVolvo −3.7 s
Top speed150 km/h180 km/hVolvo +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1590 kg1775 kgDS −185 kg
Boot350 l318 lDS +32 l
Length4118 mm4233 mmVolvo +115 mm
Width1791 mm1837 mmVolvo +46 mm
Height1534 mm1549 mmVolvo +15 mm
Wheelbase2558 mm2650 mmVolvo +92 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

DS 3 E-Tense

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Volvo EX30

Cost per 100 km5.1
Monthly64
Yearly765

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

DS 3 E-Tense

Volvo EX30

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — DS 3 E-Tense or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 402 km of the DS 3 E-Tense. That is a difference of 73 km.

How do the drivetrains of the DS 3 E-Tense and the Volvo EX30 differ?

The DS 3 E-Tense has FWD and 156 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which is more powerful — DS 3 E-Tense or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 is stronger: 272 PS against the 156 PS of the DS 3 E-Tense. The gap is 116 PS.

Which charges faster?

The DS 3 E-Tense accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Volvo EX30 up to 175 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.