Changan Deepal S07 vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 400 kW · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 510 PS · AC charging — Changan Deepal S07 11 kW, Volvo EX60 Cross Country 22 kW.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country is a D-segment SUV offering two all-wheel drive variants and high performance.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Changan Deepal S07 or Volvo EX60 Cross Country — who wins where
Volvo EX60 Cross Country leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX60 Cross Country +165 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 Cross Country +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolvo EX60 Cross Country −2.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 Cross Country +292 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 Cross Country −3.2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWVolvo EX60 Cross Country +308 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EX60 Cross Country +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S07 −222 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX60 Cross Country +13 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD | Volvo EX60 Cross CountryP10 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 640 km | Volvo +165 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 90 kWh | Volvo +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Volvo −2.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 400 kW | Volvo +308 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Volvo +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 30–80% | 18 min 10–80% | 17 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 24.9 km/min | Volvo +18.1 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 510 PS | Volvo +292 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 4.7 s | Volvo −3.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | 2295 kg | Changan −222 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 523 l | Volvo +13 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4803 mm | Volvo +53 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1899 mm | Changan +31 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1635 mm | Volvo +10 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +70 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
Volvo EX60 Cross Country
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Volvo EX60 Cross Country?
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country goes further: 640 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 165 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S07 and the Volvo EX60 Cross Country differ?
The Changan Deepal S07 has RWD and 218 PS. The Volvo EX60 Cross Country has AWD and 510 PS.
Which is more powerful — Changan Deepal S07 or Volvo EX60 Cross Country?
The Volvo EX60 Cross Country is stronger: 510 PS against the 218 PS of the Changan Deepal S07. The gap is 292 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S07 accepts up to 92 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 Cross Country up to 400 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




