Changan Deepal S07 vs Toyota bZ4X
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Toyota bZ4X 150 kW · Consumption — Changan Deepal S07 18.6 kWh/100 km, Toyota bZ4X 13.9 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — Changan Deepal S07 475 km, Toyota bZ4X 569 km.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X is a compact SUV (segment D) that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as battery packs with varying capacities.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Toyota bZ4X
- Changan Deepal S07RWD
Toyota bZ4XFWD 73.1 kWh
Changan Deepal S07 or Toyota bZ4X — who wins where
Toyota bZ4X leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota bZ4X +94 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S07 +11 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X −4.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSToyota bZ4X +6 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota bZ4X −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S07 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWToyota bZ4X +58 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgToyota bZ4X −143 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S07 +58 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Toyota bZ4X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD | Toyota bZ4X FWD 73.1 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 569 km | Toyota +94 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 69 kWh | Changan +11 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 13.9 kWh/100 km | Toyota −4.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 150 kW | Toyota +58 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 30–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 14.2 km/min | Toyota +7.4 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 224 PS | Toyota +6 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 7.4 s | Toyota −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Changan +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | 1930 kg | Toyota −143 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 452 l | Changan +58 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4690 mm | Changan +60 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1860 mm | Changan +70 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1650 mm | Toyota +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2850 mm | Changan +50 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
Toyota bZ4X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
Toyota bZ4X
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Toyota bZ4X?
The Toyota bZ4X goes further: 569 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 94 km.
Why does the Changan Deepal S07 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota bZ4X?
The Changan Deepal S07 carries 79.97 kWh and covers 475 km, while the Toyota bZ4X with its 69 kWh battery does 569 km. Energy use decides it: 18.6 against 13.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S07 and the Toyota bZ4X differ?
The Changan Deepal S07 has RWD and 218 PS. The Toyota bZ4X has FWD and 224 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Changan Deepal S07 takes more: 510 l against 452 l in the Toyota bZ4X. The difference is 58 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.