Changan Deepal S07 vs Polestar 4

Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Polestar 4 200 kW · WLTP range — Changan Deepal S07 475 km, Polestar 4 620 km · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Polestar 4 272 PS.

Changan Deepal S07

The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.

Polestar 4

The Polestar 4 is a D-segment SUV that offers high power in the Dual Motor version and a long range in the Single Motor configuration.

Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Polestar 4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Changan Deepal S07 or Polestar 4 — who wins where

Polestar 4 leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPolestar 4 +145 km
    Changan Deepal S07
    475
    Polestar 4
    620
  • Battery kWhPolestar 4 +14 kWh
    Changan Deepal S07
    79.97
    Polestar 4
    94
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPolestar 4 −0.8 kWh/100 km
    Changan Deepal S07
    18.6
    Polestar 4
    17.8
  • Power PSPolestar 4 +54 PS
    Changan Deepal S07
    218
    Polestar 4
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sPolestar 4 −0.8 s
    Changan Deepal S07
    7.9
    Polestar 4
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hPolestar 4 +20 km/h
    Changan Deepal S07
    180
    Polestar 4
    200
  • DC charging kWPolestar 4 +108 kW
    Changan Deepal S07
    92
    Polestar 4
    200
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Changan Deepal S07
    11
    Polestar 4
    11
  • Weight kgChangan Deepal S07 −157 kg
    Changan Deepal S07
    2073
    Polestar 4
    2230
  • Boot lPolestar 4 +16 l
    Changan Deepal S07
    510
    Polestar 4
    526

Add a third car

Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Polestar 4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Polestar 4
Key parameters Changan Deepal S07
RWD
Polestar 4
Rear Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range475 km620 kmPolestar +145 km
Battery79.97 kWh94 kWhPolestar +14 kWh
Consumption18.6 kWh/100 km17.8 kWh/100 kmPolestar −0.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging92 kW200 kWPolestar +108 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 35 min 30–80%30 min 10–80%5 min
Range per minute of charging6.8 km/min14.5 km/minPolestar +7.7 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power218 PS272 PSPolestar +54 PS
0–100 km/h7.9 s7.1 sPolestar −0.8 s
Top speed180 km/h200 km/hPolestar +20 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2073 kg2230 kgChangan −157 kg
Boot510 l526 lPolestar +16 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4750 mm4839 mmPolestar +89 mm
Width1930 mm2008 mmPolestar +78 mm
Height1625 mm1544 mmChangan +81 mm
Wheelbase2900 mm2999 mmPolestar +99 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Changan Deepal S07

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Polestar 4

Cost per 100 km5.34
Monthly67
Yearly801

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Changan Deepal S07

Polestar 4

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Polestar 4?

The Polestar 4 goes further: 620 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 145 km.

Which charges faster?

The Changan Deepal S07 accepts up to 92 kW DC, the Polestar 4 up to 200 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Polestar 4 uses less electricity: 17.8 kWh/100 km against 18.6 kWh/100 km in the Changan Deepal S07. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 120 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.