BYD Dolphin Surf vs Peugeot e-2008
Peugeot e-2008 leads 7 to 1
Biggest differences: Power — BYD Dolphin Surf 88 PS, Peugeot e-2008 156 PS · Boot — BYD Dolphin Surf 308 l, Peugeot e-2008 434 l · 0–100 km/h — BYD Dolphin Surf 12.1 s, Peugeot e-2008 9.1 s.
BYD Dolphin Surf
The BYD Dolphin Surf is an all-electric hatchback in the B-segment, available in three trim levels with front-wheel drive.
Peugeot e-2008
Peugeot e-2008 is a B-segment SUV with a 51 kWh battery, 156 hp and a WLTP range of 406 km.
Profile against the market: BYD Dolphin Surf vs Peugeot e-2008
BYD Dolphin SurfBoost 43.2 kWh
Peugeot e-2008156
BYD Dolphin Surf or Peugeot e-2008 — who wins where
Peugeot e-2008 leads 7 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-2008 +84 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-2008 +7.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot e-2008 −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot e-2008 +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPeugeot e-2008 −3 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWPeugeot e-2008 +15 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Dolphin Surf −178 kg
- Boot lPeugeot e-2008 +126 l
Technical data: BYD Dolphin Surf vs Peugeot e-2008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Dolphin SurfBoost 43.2 kWh | 156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 322 km | 406 km | Peugeot +84 km |
| Battery | 43.2 kWh | 51 kWh | Peugeot +7.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.6 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 85 kW | 100 kW | Peugeot +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 10–80% | 30 min 20–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 7.5 km/min | 8.1 km/min | Peugeot +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 88 PS | 156 PS | Peugeot +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 12.1 s | 9.1 s | Peugeot −3 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1370 kg | 1548 kg | BYD −178 kg |
| Boot | 308 l | 434 l | Peugeot +126 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 3990 mm | 4300 mm | Peugeot +310 mm |
| Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm | Peugeot +50 mm |
| Height | 1590 mm | 1550 mm | BYD +40 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2500 mm | 2605 mm | Peugeot +105 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Dolphin Surf
Peugeot e-2008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Dolphin Surf
Peugeot e-2008
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback / SUV, segment B
BYD Dolphin Surfvs
Fiat Grande Panda
BYD Dolphin Surfvs
Citroën ë-C3
BYD Dolphin Surfvs
BYD Dolphin Surfvs
Dongfeng Box
BYD Dolphin Surfvs
Volkswagen ID. Polo
BYD Dolphin Surfvs
Nio Firefly
Mini Aceman
Fiat 600e
Renault 4 E-Tech
Volvo EX30Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Dolphin Surf or Peugeot e-2008?
The Peugeot e-2008 goes further: 406 km WLTP against the 322 km of the BYD Dolphin Surf. That is a difference of 84 km.
Which is more powerful — BYD Dolphin Surf or Peugeot e-2008?
The Peugeot e-2008 is stronger: 156 PS against the 88 PS of the BYD Dolphin Surf. The gap is 68 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Peugeot e-2008 takes more: 434 l against 308 l in the BYD Dolphin Surf. The difference is 126 l.
Which charges faster?
The BYD Dolphin Surf accepts up to 85 kW DC, the Peugeot e-2008 up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.