BMW iX4 vs Togg T10X

BMW iX4 leads 8 to 2

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX4 400 kW, Togg T10X 180 kW · Power — BMW iX4 469 PS, Togg T10X 218 PS · AC charging — BMW iX4 11 kW, Togg T10X 22 kW.

BMW iX4

The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.

Togg T10X

The Togg T10X is a D-segment SUV that offers rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, as well as the option for fast DC charging.

Profile against the market: BMW iX4 vs Togg T10X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX4 or Togg T10X — who wins where

BMW iX4 leads 8 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +305 km
    BMW iX4
    828
    Togg T10X
    523
  • Battery kWhBMW iX4 +20.2 kWh
    BMW iX4
    108.7
    Togg T10X
    88.5
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX4 −3.4 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX4
    15.7
    Togg T10X
    19.1
  • Power PSBMW iX4 +251 PS
    BMW iX4
    469
    Togg T10X
    218
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX4 −2.9 s
    BMW iX4
    4.9
    Togg T10X
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +25 km/h
    BMW iX4
    210
    Togg T10X
    185
  • DC charging kWBMW iX4 +220 kW
    BMW iX4
    400
    Togg T10X
    180
  • AC charging kWTogg T10X +11 kW
    BMW iX4
    11
    Togg T10X
    22
  • Weight ↓ kgTogg T10X −207 kg
    BMW iX4
    2305
    Togg T10X
    2098
  • Boot lBMW iX4 +49 l
    BMW iX4
    490
    Togg T10X
    441

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Togg T10X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Togg T10X
Key parameters BMW iX4
50 xDrive
Togg T10X
V1 RWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range828 km523 kmBMW +305 km
Battery108.7 kWh88.5 kWhBMW +20.2 kWh
Consumption ↓15.7 kWh/100 km19.1 kWh/100 kmBMW −3.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging400 kW180 kWBMW +220 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWTogg +11 kW
Charging ⚠21 min 10–80%28 min 20–80%7 min
Range per minute of charging27.6 km/min11.2 km/minBMW +16.4 km/min
Voltage800 V——
Performance and drivetrain
Power469 PS218 PSBMW +251 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.9 s7.8 sBMW −2.9 s
Top speed210 km/h185 km/hBMW +25 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2305 kg2098 kgTogg −207 kg
Boot490 l441 lBMW +49 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4782 mm4599 mmBMW +183 mm
Width1895 mm1886 mmBMW +9 mm
Height1595 mm1676 mmTogg +81 mm
Wheelbase2897 mm2890 mmBMW +7 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX4

Cost per 100 km4.71
Monthly59
Yearly707

Togg T10X

Cost per 100 km5.73
Monthly72
Yearly860

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX4

Togg T10X

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX4 or Togg T10X?

The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 523 km of the Togg T10X. That is a difference of 305 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX4 and the Togg T10X differ?

The BMW iX4 has AWD and 469 PS. The Togg T10X has RWD and 218 PS.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX4 or Togg T10X?

The BMW iX4 is stronger: 469 PS against the 218 PS of the Togg T10X. The gap is 251 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW iX4 takes more: 490 l against 441 l in the Togg T10X. The difference is 49 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.