Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs VinFast VF 8
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, VinFast VF 8 150 kW · Consumption — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 15.3 kWh/100 km, VinFast VF 8 22.9 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 679 km, VinFast VF 8 471 km.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
VinFast VF 8
The VinFast VF 8 is a D-segment SUV offering all-wheel drive and power ranging from 354 to 408 horsepower, with a WLTP range of up to 471 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs VinFast VF 8
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
VinFast VF 8Eco
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or VinFast VF 8 — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +208 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +7.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −7.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVinFast VF 8 +48 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVinFast VF 8 −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +120 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −255 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +135 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs VinFast VF 8
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | VinFast VF 8 Eco | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 471 km | Audi +208 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 87.7 kWh | Audi +7.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 22.9 kWh/100 km | Audi −7.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 150 kW | Audi +120 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 31 min 10–70% | 9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 9.1 km/min | Audi +12.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 354 PS | VinFast +48 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 5.9 s | VinFast −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2455 kg | Audi −255 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 376 l | Audi +135 l |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4750 mm | Audi +21 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1934 mm | Audi +5 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1667 mm | VinFast +56 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2950 mm | VinFast +57 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
VinFast VF 8
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
VinFast VF 8
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or VinFast VF 8?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 471 km of the VinFast VF 8. That is a difference of 208 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the VinFast VF 8 differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The VinFast VF 8 has AWD and 354 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron takes more: 511 l against 376 l in the VinFast VF 8. The difference is 135 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the VinFast VF 8 up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.