Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Nissan Ariya
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Nissan Ariya 130 kW · AC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Nissan Ariya 22 kW · Top speed — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 210 km/h, Nissan Ariya 160 km/h.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Nissan Ariya
The Nissan Ariya is a crossover in the D segment that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, with a range of up to 533 kilometers (WLTP).
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Nissan Ariya
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Nissan Ariya87 kWh
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Nissan Ariya — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +146 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +7.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +50 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +140 kW
- AC charging kWNissan Ariya +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgNissan Ariya −141 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +45 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Nissan Ariya
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Nissan Ariya 87 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 533 km | Audi +146 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 87 kWh | Audi +7.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 130 kW | Audi +140 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Nissan +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 30 min 20–80% | 8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 10.7 km/min | Audi +10.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 238 PS | Audi +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.6 s | Audi −1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 160 km/h | Audi +50 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2059 kg | Nissan −141 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 466 l | Audi +45 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Nissan |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4595 mm | Audi +176 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1850 mm | Audi +89 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1650 mm | Nissan +39 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2775 mm | Audi +118 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Nissan Ariya
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Nissan Ariya
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Nissan Ariya?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 533 km of the Nissan Ariya. That is a difference of 146 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the Nissan Ariya differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Nissan Ariya has FWD and 238 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Nissan Ariya — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Nissan Ariya up to 130 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.