Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S07
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Changan Deepal S07 92 kW · WLTP range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 679 km, Changan Deepal S07 475 km · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, Changan Deepal S07 218 PS.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S07
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance- Changan Deepal S07RWD
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Changan Deepal S07 — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +204 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +14.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −3.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +88 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +30 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +178 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S07 −127 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +1 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S07
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Changan Deepal S07 RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 475 km | Audi +204 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 79.97 kWh | Audi +14.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 18.6 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 92 kW | Audi +178 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 35 min 30–80% | 13 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 6.8 km/min | Audi +14.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 218 PS | Audi +88 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.9 s | Audi −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Audi +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2073 kg | Changan −127 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 510 l | Audi +1 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Changan |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4750 mm | Audi +21 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1930 mm | Audi +9 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1625 mm | Changan +14 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2900 mm | Changan +7 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Changan Deepal S07
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Changan Deepal S07
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Changan Deepal S07?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 204 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S07 — its 79.97 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Changan Deepal S07?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 218 PS of the Changan Deepal S07. The gap is 88 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Changan Deepal S07 up to 92 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.