Audi Q6 e-tron vs Elaris BEO

Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 e-tron 270 kW, Elaris BEO 100 kW · Power — Audi Q6 e-tron 306 PS, Elaris BEO 204 PS · Top speed — Audi Q6 e-tron 210 km/h, Elaris BEO 150 km/h.

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering four powertrain variants with different power and range.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Profile against the market: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Elaris BEO

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi Q6 e-tron or Elaris BEO — who wins where

Audi Q6 e-tron leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi Q6 e-tron +172 km
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    661
    Elaris BEO
    489
  • Battery kWhAudi Q6 e-tron +8.9 kWh
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    94.9
    Elaris BEO
    86
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 e-tron −3.4 kWh/100 km
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    15.9
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
  • Power PSAudi Q6 e-tron +102 PS
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    306
    Elaris BEO
    204
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    6.6
    Elaris BEO
  • Top speed km/hAudi Q6 e-tron +60 km/h
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    210
    Elaris BEO
    150
  • DC charging kWAudi Q6 e-tron +170 kW
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    270
    Elaris BEO
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    11
    Elaris BEO
    11
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −245 kg
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    2200
    Elaris BEO
    1955
  • Boot lAudi Q6 e-tron +59 l
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    526
    Elaris BEO
    467

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Elaris BEO

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Elaris BEO
Key parameters Audi Q6 e-tron
performance
Elaris BEO
Standard
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range661 km489 kmAudi +172 km
Battery94.9 kWh86 kWhAudi +8.9 kWh
Consumption15.9 kWh/100 km19.3 kWh/100 kmAudi −3.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging270 kW100 kWAudi +170 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 21 min 10–80%45 min 20–80%24 min
Range per minute of charging22 km/min6.5 km/minAudi +15.5 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power306 PS204 PSAudi +102 PS
0–100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed210 km/h150 km/hAudi +60 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2200 kg1955 kgElaris −245 kg
Boot526 l467 lAudi +59 l
Length4771 mm4698 mmAudi +73 mm
Width1939 mm1908 mmAudi +31 mm
Height1648 mm1696 mmElaris +48 mm
Wheelbase2893 mm2800 mmAudi +93 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi Q6 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi Q6 e-tron

Elaris BEO

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 e-tron or Elaris BEO?

The Audi Q6 e-tron goes further: 661 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 172 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Elaris BEO differ?

The Audi Q6 e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS.

Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 e-tron or Elaris BEO?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 102 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Audi Q6 e-tron takes more: 526 l against 467 l in the Elaris BEO. The difference is 59 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.