Alfa Romeo Junior vs Kia EV2

Biggest differences: Battery — Alfa Romeo Junior 51 kWh, Kia EV2 61 kWh · DC charging — Alfa Romeo Junior 100 kW, Kia EV2 118 kW · Power — Alfa Romeo Junior 156 PS, Kia EV2 135 PS.

Alfa Romeo Junior

The Alfa Romeo Junior is a compact electric SUV that comes in two power variants, offering a range of up to 410 kilometers and a maximum power output of 280 horsepower.

Kia EV2

The Kia EV2 is an electric SUV in the B-segment, offering two front-wheel drive variants with different battery capacities and power outputs.

Profile against the market: Alfa Romeo Junior vs Kia EV2

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Alfa Romeo Junior or Kia EV2 — who wins where

Alfa Romeo Junior leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia EV2 +43 km
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    410
    Kia EV2
    453
  • Battery kWhKia EV2 +10 kWh
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    51
    Kia EV2
    61
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmAlfa Romeo Junior −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    15
    Kia EV2
    15.2
  • Power PSAlfa Romeo Junior +21 PS
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    156
    Kia EV2
    135
  • 0–100 km/h sAlfa Romeo Junior −0.5 s
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    9
    Kia EV2
    9.5
  • Top speed km/hKia EV2 +11 km/h
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    150
    Kia EV2
    161
  • DC charging kWKia EV2 +18 kW
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    100
    Kia EV2
    118
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    11
    Kia EV2
    11
  • Weight kgAlfa Romeo Junior −85 kg
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    1470
    Kia EV2
    1555
  • Boot lAlfa Romeo Junior +38 l
    Alfa Romeo Junior
    400
    Kia EV2
    362

Add a third car

Technical data: Alfa Romeo Junior vs Kia EV2

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Alfa Romeo Junior vs Kia EV2
Key parameters Alfa Romeo Junior
Elettrica
Kia EV2
61 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range410 km453 kmKia +43 km
Battery51 kWh61 kWhKia +10 kWh
Consumption15 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmAlfa Romeo −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW118 kWKia +18 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 27 min 20–80%30 min 10–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging9.1 km/min10.6 km/minKia +1.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS135 PSAlfa Romeo +21 PS
0–100 km/h9 s9.5 sAlfa Romeo −0.5 s
Top speed150 km/h161 km/hKia +11 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1470 kg1555 kgAlfa Romeo −85 kg
Boot400 l362 lAlfa Romeo +38 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Kia
Length4170 mm4060 mmAlfa Romeo +110 mm
Width1780 mm1800 mmKia +20 mm
Height1500 mm1575 mmKia +75 mm
Wheelbase2557 mm2565 mmKia +8 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Alfa Romeo Junior

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Kia EV2

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Alfa Romeo Junior

Kia EV2

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Alfa Romeo Junior or Kia EV2?

The Kia EV2 goes further: 453 km WLTP against the 410 km of the Alfa Romeo Junior. That is a difference of 43 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Kia EV2 — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Alfa Romeo Junior, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Alfa Romeo Junior accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Kia EV2 up to 118 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.