Alfa Romeo Junior vs Ford Puma Gen-E
Ford Puma Gen-E leads 6 to 2
Biggest differences: Boot — Alfa Romeo Junior 400 l, Ford Puma Gen-E 523 l · Consumption — Alfa Romeo Junior 15 kWh/100 km, Ford Puma Gen-E 13 kWh/100 km · 0–100 km/h — Alfa Romeo Junior 9 s, Ford Puma Gen-E 8 s.
Alfa Romeo Junior
The Alfa Romeo Junior is a compact electric SUV that comes in two power variants, offering a range of up to 410 kilometers and a maximum power output of 280 horsepower.
Ford Puma Gen-E
The Ford Puma Gen-E is an all-electric subcompact crossover with a range of 419 kilometers and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 8 seconds.
Profile against the market: Alfa Romeo Junior vs Ford Puma Gen-E
Alfa Romeo JuniorElettrica
Ford Puma Gen-EElectric
Alfa Romeo Junior or Ford Puma Gen-E — who wins where
Ford Puma Gen-E leads 6 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Puma Gen-E +9 km
- Battery kWhAlfa Romeo Junior +4.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Puma Gen-E −2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Puma Gen-E +12 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Puma Gen-E −1 s
- Top speed km/hFord Puma Gen-E +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgAlfa Romeo Junior −18 kg
- Boot lFord Puma Gen-E +123 l
Technical data: Alfa Romeo Junior vs Ford Puma Gen-E
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Alfa Romeo Junior Elettrica | Ford Puma Gen-E Electric | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 410 km | 419 km | Ford +9 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 46.8 kWh | Alfa Romeo +4.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15 kWh/100 km | 13 kWh/100 km | Ford −2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 26 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.1 km/min | 11.3 km/min | Ford +2.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 168 PS | Ford +12 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9 s | 8 s | Ford −1 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 160 km/h | Ford +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1470 kg | 1488 kg | Alfa Romeo −18 kg |
| Boot | 400 l | 523 l | Ford +123 l |
| Length | 4170 mm | 4214 mm | Ford +44 mm |
| Width | 1780 mm | 1805 mm | Ford +25 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm | 1555 mm | Ford +55 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2557 mm | 2588 mm | Ford +31 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma Gen-E
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma Gen-E
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Alfa Romeo Junior or Ford Puma Gen-E?
The Ford Puma Gen-E goes further: 419 km WLTP against the 410 km of the Alfa Romeo Junior. That is a difference of 9 km.
Why does the Alfa Romeo Junior have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Ford Puma Gen-E?
The Alfa Romeo Junior carries 51 kWh and covers 410 km, while the Ford Puma Gen-E with its 46.8 kWh battery does 419 km. Energy use decides it: 15 against 13 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Ford Puma Gen-E takes more: 523 l against 400 l in the Alfa Romeo Junior. The difference is 123 l.
Which charges faster?
The Alfa Romeo Junior accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Ford Puma Gen-E up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.