Subaru Solterra vs VinFast VF 8

Biggest differences: Power — Subaru Solterra 218 PS, VinFast VF 8 354 PS · Consumption — Subaru Solterra 15.4 kWh/100 km, VinFast VF 8 22.9 kWh/100 km · Top speed — Subaru Solterra 160 km/h, VinFast VF 8 200 km/h.

Subaru Solterra

The Subaru Solterra is a compact SUV with AWD and a WLTP range of 466 km.

VinFast VF 8

The VinFast VF 8 is a D-segment SUV offering all-wheel drive and power ranging from 354 to 408 horsepower, with a WLTP range of up to 471 kilometers.

Profile against the market: Subaru Solterra vs VinFast VF 8

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Subaru Solterra or VinFast VF 8 — who wins where

VinFast VF 8 leads 5 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVinFast VF 8 +5 km
    Subaru Solterra
    466
    VinFast VF 8
    471
  • Battery kWhVinFast VF 8 +16.3 kWh
    Subaru Solterra
    71.4
    VinFast VF 8
    87.7
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmSubaru Solterra −7.5 kWh/100 km
    Subaru Solterra
    15.4
    VinFast VF 8
    22.9
  • Power PSVinFast VF 8 +136 PS
    Subaru Solterra
    218
    VinFast VF 8
    354
  • 0–100 km/h sVinFast VF 8 −1 s
    Subaru Solterra
    6.9
    VinFast VF 8
    5.9
  • Top speed km/hVinFast VF 8 +40 km/h
    Subaru Solterra
    160
    VinFast VF 8
    200
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Subaru Solterra
    150
    VinFast VF 8
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Subaru Solterra
    11
    VinFast VF 8
    11
  • Weight kgSubaru Solterra −445 kg
    Subaru Solterra
    2010
    VinFast VF 8
    2455
  • Boot lSubaru Solterra +76 l
    Subaru Solterra
    452
    VinFast VF 8
    376

Add a third car

Technical data: Subaru Solterra vs VinFast VF 8

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Subaru Solterra vs VinFast VF 8
Key parameters Subaru Solterra
AWD
VinFast VF 8
Eco
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range466 km471 kmVinFast +5 km
Battery71.4 kWh87.7 kWhVinFast +16.3 kWh
Consumption15.4 kWh/100 km22.9 kWh/100 kmSubaru −7.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW150 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 30 min 10–80%31 min 10–70%1 min
Range per minute of charging10.9 km/min9.1 km/minSubaru +1.8 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power218 PS354 PSVinFast +136 PS
0–100 km/h6.9 s5.9 sVinFast −1 s
Top speed160 km/h200 km/hVinFast +40 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2010 kg2455 kgSubaru −445 kg
Boot452 l376 lSubaru +76 l
Length4690 mm4750 mmVinFast +60 mm
Width1860 mm1934 mmVinFast +74 mm
Height1650 mm1667 mmVinFast +17 mm
Wheelbase2850 mm2950 mmVinFast +100 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Subaru Solterra

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

VinFast VF 8

Cost per 100 km6.87
Monthly86
Yearly1030

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Subaru Solterra

VinFast VF 8

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which is more powerful — Subaru Solterra or VinFast VF 8?

The VinFast VF 8 is stronger: 354 PS against the 218 PS of the Subaru Solterra. The gap is 136 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Subaru Solterra takes more: 452 l against 376 l in the VinFast VF 8. The difference is 76 l.

Which charges faster?

The Subaru Solterra accepts up to 150 kW DC, the VinFast VF 8 up to 150 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Subaru Solterra uses less electricity: 15.4 kWh/100 km against 22.9 kWh/100 km in the VinFast VF 8. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 1125 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.