Peugeot e-308 SW vs Toyota bZ4X Touring
Biggest differences: DC charging — Peugeot e-308 SW 100 kW, Toyota bZ4X Touring 150 kW · Power — Peugeot e-308 SW 156 PS, Toyota bZ4X Touring 224 PS · WLTP range — Peugeot e-308 SW 444 km, Toyota bZ4X Touring 591 km.
Peugeot e-308 SW
The Peugeot e-308 SW is an electric estate in the C-segment, offering a range of 444 km according to the WLTP cycle and a spacious trunk with a capacity of 505 liters.
Toyota bZ4X Touring
The Toyota bZ4X Touring is an all-electric estate in the C-segment, offering two drive variants with different power outputs and acceleration characteristics.
Profile against the market: Peugeot e-308 SW vs Toyota bZ4X Touring
Peugeot e-308 SW or Toyota bZ4X Touring — who wins where
Toyota bZ4X Touring leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota bZ4X Touring +147 km
- Battery kWhToyota bZ4X Touring +15.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X Touring −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSToyota bZ4X Touring +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota bZ4X Touring −2.2 s
- Top speed km/hPeugeot e-308 SW +10 km/h
- DC charging kWToyota bZ4X Touring +50 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-308 SW −192 kg
- Boot lToyota bZ4X Touring +164 l
Technical data: Peugeot e-308 SW vs Toyota bZ4X Touring
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Peugeot e-308 SW156 |  Toyota bZ4X TouringFWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 444 km | 591 km | Toyota +147 km |
| Battery | 55.4 kWh | 71 kWh | Toyota +15.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.1 kWh/100 km | 14 kWh/100 km | Toyota −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 150 kW | Toyota +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 32 min 20–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.3 km/min | 14.8 km/min | Toyota +6.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 224 PS | Toyota +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9.5 s | 7.3 s | Toyota −2.2 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 160 km/h | Peugeot +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1708 kg | 1900 kg | Peugeot −192 kg |
| Boot | 505 l | 669 l | Toyota +164 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4640 mm | 4830 mm | Toyota +190 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1860 mm | Toyota +10 mm |
| Height | 1460 mm | 1675 mm | Toyota +215 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2730 mm | 2850 mm | Toyota +120 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot e-308 SW
Toyota bZ4X Touring
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot e-308 SW
Toyota bZ4X Touring
Other comparisons in this class: Estate, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Peugeot e-308 SW or Toyota bZ4X Touring?
The Toyota bZ4X Touring goes further: 591 km WLTP against the 444 km of the Peugeot e-308 SW. That is a difference of 147 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot e-308 SW — its 55.4 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Toyota bZ4X Touring, with 71 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Peugeot e-308 SW or Toyota bZ4X Touring?
The Toyota bZ4X Touring is stronger: 224 PS against the 156 PS of the Peugeot e-308 SW. The gap is 68 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Toyota bZ4X Touring takes more: 669 l against 505 l in the Peugeot e-308 SW. The difference is 164 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.