Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric vs Peugeot e-308 SW
Biggest differences: Consumption — Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric 15.6 kWh/100 km, Peugeot e-308 SW 15.1 kWh/100 km · Boot — Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric 516 l, Peugeot e-308 SW 505 l.
Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric
The Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric is an electric estate in the C-segment, offering a range of 445 km in the WLTP cycle.
Peugeot e-308 SW
The Peugeot e-308 SW is an electric estate in the C-segment, offering a range of 444 km according to the WLTP cycle and a spacious trunk with a capacity of 505 liters.
Profile against the market: Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric vs Peugeot e-308 SW
Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric or Peugeot e-308 SW — who wins where
Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric leads 3 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmOpel Astra Sports Tourer Electric +1 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-308 SW +0.4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot e-308 SW −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgOpel Astra Sports Tourer Electric −18 kg
- Boot lOpel Astra Sports Tourer Electric +11 l
Technical data: Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric vs Peugeot e-308 SW
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric156 |  Peugeot e-308 SW156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 445 km | 444 km | Opel +1 km |
| Battery | 55 kWh | 55.4 kWh | Peugeot +0.4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.6 kWh/100 km | 15.1 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 32 min | 32 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.3 km/min | 8.3 km/min | No difference |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 156 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9.5 s | 9.5 s | No difference |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 170 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1690 kg | 1708 kg | Opel −18 kg |
| Boot | 516 l | 505 l | Opel +11 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4642 mm | 4640 mm | Opel +2 mm |
| Width | 1859 mm | 1850 mm | Opel +9 mm |
| Height | 1463 mm | 1460 mm | Opel +3 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2732 mm | 2730 mm | Opel +2 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric
Peugeot e-308 SW
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric
Peugeot e-308 SW
Other comparisons in this class: Estate, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Peugeot e-308 SW have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric?
The Peugeot e-308 SW carries 55.4 kWh and covers 444 km, while the Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric with its 55 kWh battery does 445 km. Energy use decides it: 15.1 against 15.6 kWh/100 km.
Which charges faster?
The Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Peugeot e-308 SW up to 100 kW. Charging from 20 to 80% takes 32 and 32 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Peugeot e-308 SW uses less electricity: 15.1 kWh/100 km against 15.6 kWh/100 km in the Opel Astra Sports Tourer Electric. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.