Mercedes EQV vs Mercedes eVito Tourer
Biggest differences: DC charging — Mercedes EQV 110 kW, Mercedes eVito Tourer 50 kW · Charging 10–80% — Mercedes EQV 45 min, Mercedes eVito Tourer 80 min · Top speed — Mercedes EQV 160 km/h, Mercedes eVito Tourer 140 km/h.
Mercedes EQV
The Mercedes EQV is an all-electric van in the D-segment, offering two variants with different battery capacities and ranges.
Mercedes eVito Tourer
The Mercedes eVito Tourer is a van in the D segment with front-wheel drive, offering two battery options and a range of up to 367 km (WLTP).
Profile against the market: Mercedes EQV vs Mercedes eVito Tourer
Mercedes EQVEQV 300- Mercedes eVito TourerTourer 90 kWh
Mercedes EQV or Mercedes eVito Tourer — who wins where
Mercedes EQV leads 4 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes eVito Tourer +2 km
- Battery kWhMercedes EQV +3.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes eVito Tourer −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hMercedes EQV +20 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes EQV +60 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMercedes EQV −35 min
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Mercedes EQV vs Mercedes eVito Tourer
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes EQV EQV 300 | Mercedes eVito Tourer Tourer 90 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 365 km | 367 km | Mercedes +2 km |
| Battery | 93.3 kWh | 90 kWh | Mercedes +3.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 27.5 kWh/100 km | 27 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 110 kW | 50 kW | Mercedes +60 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 45 min | 80 min | Mercedes −35 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 5.7 km/min | 3.2 km/min | Mercedes +2.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 204 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 12.2 s | — | — |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 140 km/h | Mercedes +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2719 kg | — | — |
| Boot | — | — | — |
| Length | 5370 mm | 5140 mm | Mercedes +230 mm |
| Width | 1928 mm | 1928 mm | No difference |
| Height | 1901 mm | 1930 mm | Mercedes +29 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3200 mm | 3200 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes EQV
Mercedes eVito Tourer
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes EQV
Mercedes eVito Tourer
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Mercedes EQVvs
Opel Zafira ElectricMercedes EQVvs
Volkswagen e-Transporter KombiMercedes EQVvsVolkswagen ID. BuzzMercedes EQVvs
Maxus MIFA 7Mercedes eVito TourervsVolkswagen e-CaravelleMercedes eVito TourervsOpel Zafira ElectricMercedes eVito TourervsVolkswagen ID. BuzzMercedes eVito TourervsMaxus MIFA 7Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Mercedes EQV have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mercedes eVito Tourer?
The Mercedes EQV carries 93.3 kWh and covers 365 km, while the Mercedes eVito Tourer with its 90 kWh battery does 367 km. Energy use decides it: 27.5 against 27 kWh/100 km.
Which charges faster?
The Mercedes EQV accepts up to 110 kW DC, the Mercedes eVito Tourer up to 50 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 45 and 80 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.