Kia EV4 Fastback vs Peugeot e-408
Kia EV4 Fastback leads 6 to 3
Biggest differences: Battery — Kia EV4 Fastback 81.4 kWh, Peugeot e-408 58.2 kWh · WLTP range — Kia EV4 Fastback 633 km, Peugeot e-408 456 km · 0–100 km/h — Kia EV4 Fastback 7.7 s, Peugeot e-408 7.2 s.
Kia EV4 Fastback
The Kia EV4 fastback is an electric sedan in the C-segment, offering two battery options with a range of up to 633 km in the WLTP cycle.
Peugeot e-408
Peugeot e-408 is a C-segment saloon with a fastback profile, with a 58.2 kWh battery, 213 hp and a WLTP range of 456 km.
Profile against the market: Kia EV4 Fastback vs Peugeot e-408
Kia EV4 Fastback81.4 kWh FWD
Peugeot e-408GT
Kia EV4 Fastback or Peugeot e-408 — who wins where
Kia EV4 Fastback leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmKia EV4 Fastback +177 km
- Battery kWhKia EV4 Fastback +23.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmKia EV4 Fastback −0.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot e-408 +9 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPeugeot e-408 −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hKia EV4 Fastback +10 km/h
- DC charging kWKia EV4 Fastback +8 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-408 −21 kg
- Boot lKia EV4 Fastback +19 l
Technical data: Kia EV4 Fastback vs Peugeot e-408
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Kia EV4 Fastback 81.4 kWh FWD | Peugeot e-408 GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 633 km | 456 km | Kia +177 km |
| Battery | 81.4 kWh | 58.2 kWh | Kia +23.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.4 kWh/100 km | 15 kWh/100 km | Kia −0.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 128 kW | 120 kW | Kia +8 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 31 min 10–80% | 30 min 20–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 9.1 km/min | Kia +5.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 213 PS | Peugeot +9 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.7 s | 7.2 s | Peugeot −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 160 km/h | Kia +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1825 kg | 1804 kg | Peugeot −21 kg |
| Boot | 490 l | 471 l | Kia +19 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4730 mm | 4690 mm | Kia +40 mm |
| Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm | Kia +10 mm |
| Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm | Peugeot +10 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2820 mm | 2790 mm | Kia +30 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Kia EV4 Fastback
Peugeot e-408
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Kia EV4 Fastback
Peugeot e-408
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Kia EV4 Fastback or Peugeot e-408?
The Kia EV4 Fastback goes further: 633 km WLTP against the 456 km of the Peugeot e-408. That is a difference of 177 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot e-408 — its 58.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Kia EV4 Fastback, with 81.4 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Kia EV4 Fastback accepts up to 128 kW DC, the Peugeot e-408 up to 120 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Kia EV4 Fastback uses less electricity: 14.4 kWh/100 km against 15 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot e-408. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 90 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.