Citroën ë-C4 X vs Peugeot e-408
Biggest differences: Power — Citroën ë-C4 X 156 PS, Peugeot e-408 210 PS · DC charging — Citroën ë-C4 X 100 kW, Peugeot e-408 120 kW · Charging 20–80% — Citroën ë-C4 X 35 min, Peugeot e-408 30 min.
Citroën ë-C4 X
The Citroën ë-C4 X is a compact electric sedan that offers two different power and range options.
Peugeot e-408
The Peugeot e-408 is an electric sedan in the C segment, offering a range of 453 km according to the WLTP cycle and front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Citroën ë-C4 X vs Peugeot e-408
Citroën ë-C4 XElectric 156
Peugeot e-408GT
Citroën ë-C4 X or Peugeot e-408 — who wins where
Peugeot e-408 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-408 +26 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-408 +7.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-C4 X −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot e-408 +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPeugeot e-408 −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hPeugeot e-408 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWPeugeot e-408 +20 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minPeugeot e-408 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-C4 X −227 kg
- Boot lCitroën ë-C4 X +39 l
Technical data: Citroën ë-C4 X vs Peugeot e-408
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Citroën ë-C4 X Electric 156 | Peugeot e-408 GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 427 km | 453 km | Peugeot +26 km |
| Battery | 51 kWh | 58.2 kWh | Peugeot +7.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.6 kWh/100 km | 15 kWh/100 km | Citroën −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 120 kW | Peugeot +20 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 35 min | 30 min | Peugeot −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 7.3 km/min | 9.1 km/min | Peugeot +1.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 210 PS | Peugeot +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.9 s | 8 s | Peugeot −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 170 km/h | Peugeot +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1577 kg | 1804 kg | Citroën −227 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 471 l | Citroën +39 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4580 mm | 4690 mm | Peugeot +110 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm | Peugeot +50 mm |
| Height | 1525 mm | 1490 mm | Citroën +35 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2670 mm | 2790 mm | Peugeot +120 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Citroën ë-C4 X
Peugeot e-408
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Citroën ë-C4 X
Peugeot e-408
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Citroën ë-C4 X or Peugeot e-408?
The Peugeot e-408 goes further: 453 km WLTP against the 427 km of the Citroën ë-C4 X. That is a difference of 26 km.
Which is more powerful — Citroën ë-C4 X or Peugeot e-408?
The Peugeot e-408 is stronger: 210 PS against the 156 PS of the Citroën ë-C4 X. The gap is 54 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Citroën ë-C4 X accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Peugeot e-408 up to 120 kW. Charging from 20 to 80% takes 35 and 30 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Citroën ë-C4 X uses less electricity: 14.6 kWh/100 km against 15 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot e-408. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.